Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2013 Nov;39(6):356–364. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2013.818680

Table 2.

SWM performance of adolescent and young adult participants across SWM and vigilance conditions.

FHN (n=26) M (SD) % FHP (n=24) M (SD) % OA (n=35) M(SD) % F (p)
Vigilance accuracy (%)* 95.52 (2.13) 95.63 (2.17) 96.70 (1.49) 3.34 (.04)
Vigilance reaction time (ms)* 656.32 (60.94) 654.42 (53.67) 605.50 (62.76) 5.60 (.01)
SWM accuracy* 88.29 (7.62) 93.23 (4.23) 92.79 (5.01) 6.63 (.00)
SWM reaction time (ms)* 622.67 (77.32) 576.38 (74.92) 558.49 (64.16) 5.68 (.01)
*

p < .05