Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jun 9;17(6):1527–1534. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0028

Table 2.

Relationship of familial risk to CAM use (n = 1869)*

Total Pop (n = 2198) Average Risk** (n = 920) Moderate Risk (n = 682) High Risk (n = 267)

Number (n) Percent (%) Number (n) Percent (%) Number (n) Percent (%) OR (95% CI) Number (n) Percent (%) OR (95% CI)
Any CAM modality 1089 49.5 444 48.3 333 48.8 1.02 (0.84, 1.25) 145 54.3 1.27 (0.97, 1.67)
    Biologically-based 933 42.4 378 41.1 295 43.3 1.09 (0.89, 1.34) 122 45.7 1.21 (0.92, 1.59)
        Soy products 261 11.9 113 12.3 87 12.8 1.04 (0.77, 1.41) 24 9.0 0.71 (0.44, 1.12)
        Organic foods 135 6.14 51 5.5 52 7.6 1.41 (0.94, 2.10) 16 6.0 1.09 (0.61, 1.94)
        Vitamins 821 37.4 332 36.1 256 37.5 1.06 (0.87, 1.31) 111 41.6 1.26 (0.95, 1.66)
        Herbal supplements 171 7.8 59 6.4 66 9.7 1.56 (1.08, 2.26) 18 6.7 1.06 (0.61, 1.82)
    Mind-body or body based 604 27.5 238 25.9 184 27.0 1.06 (0.85, 1.33) 86 32.2 1.36 (1.01, 1.83)
        Yoga/meditation 103 4.7 39 4.2 39 5.7 1.37 (0.87, 2.16) 8 3.0 0.70 (0.32, 1.51)
        Relaxation/massage 155 7.1 58 6.3 52 7.6 1.23 (0.83, 1.81) 16 6.0 0.95 (0.54,1.68)
        Chiropractic 121 5.5 39 4.2 50 7.3 1.79 (1.16, 2.75) 11 4.1 0.97 (0.49, 1.92)
        Prayer/spirituality 472 21.5 193 21.0 134 19.7 0.92 (0.72, 1.18) 73 27.3 1.42 (1.04, 1.94)
*

Information about both CAM use and familial risk, defined by family history, was available on n = 1869 subjects; the differences between the total number of subjects and frequencies shown in the table are due to missing data.

**

Average risk serves as the reference group for each comparison.