Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jun 9;17(6):1527–1534. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0028

Table 3.

Relationship of perceived risk to CAM use (n = 2184)*

Total Pop (n = 2198) No Perceived Risk* (n = 228) Low Perceived Risk (n = 1616) High Perceived Risk (n = 340)

Number (n) Percent (%) Number (n) Percent (%) Number (n) Percent (%) OR (95% CI) Number (n) Percent (%) OR (95% CI)
Any CAM modality 1089 49.5 99 43.4 803 49.7 1.29 (0.97, 1.70) 182 53.5 1.50 (1.07, 2.10)
    Biologically-based 933 42.4 83 36.4 695 43.0 1.32 (0.99, 1.76) 151 44.4 1.40 (0.99, 1.97)
        Soy products 261 11.9 22 9.7 193 11.9 1.27 (0.80, 2.02) 46 13.5 1.47 (0.86, 2.51)
        Organic foods 135 6.14 11 4.8 103 6.4 1.34 (0.71, 2.54) 21 6.2 1.30 (0.61, 2.75)
        Vitamins 821 37.4 69 30.3 617 38.2 1.42 (1.05, 1.92) 131 38.5 1.44 (1.01, 2.06)
        Herbal supplements 171 7.8 14 6.1 133 8.2 1.37 (0.78, 2.42) 23 6.8 1.11 (0.56, 2.20)
    Mind-body or body based 604 27.5 52 22.8 439 27.2 1.26 (0.91, 1.75) 109 32.1 1.60 (1.09, 2.35)
        Yoga/meditation 103 4.7 7 3.1 82 5.1 1.69 (0.77, 3.70) 14 4.1 1.36 (0.54, 3.41)
        Relaxation/massage 155 7.1 11 4.8 114 7.1 1.50 (0.79, 2.83) 30 8.8 1.91 (0.94, 3.89)
        Chiropractic 121 5.5 12 5.3 93 5.8 1.10 (0.59, 2.04) 16 4.7 0.89 (0.41, 1.92)
        Prayer/spirituality 472 21.5 41 18.0 348 21.5 1.25 (0.88, 1.79) 79 23.2 1.38 (0.91, 2.10)
*

Information about both CAM use and self-reported perceived risk was available on n = 2184 subjects; the differences between the total number of subjects and frequencies shown in the table are due to missing data.

*

Perception of no risk serves as the reference group for each comparison.