Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cognit Ther Res. 2013 Dec 7;38(2):226–238. doi: 10.1007/s10608-013-9580-x

Table 2.

Repeated measures analysis of variance pre-post in dependent variables: entire sample.

Outcome measure Mean (SD) (Pre-test) Mean (SD) (Post-test) F-value (dfbetween, dfwithin) Cohen’s d
AAT approach tendency 20.35(60.36) 2.70(57.51) 2.17(1,42) 0.30
LSAS 70.40(14.85) 64.88(20.61) 6.79(1,42)* 0.31
SPIN 41.44 (11.35) 37.07 (11.99) 11.66(1,42)** 0.37
BDI-II 12.74(11.09) 11.60(10.63) 2.07(1,42) 0.10
IPSM-29 80.56(10.80) 82.06(10.73) 1.31(1,35) 0.14
BAT Interaction – Latency (seconds) 15.15(16.85) 12.49(11.71) 1.02(1,36) 0.18
BAT Interaction – Duration (seconds) 261.32(86.69) 260.60(77.81) 0.01(1,39) 0.01
BAT Interaction – Anticipation STAI-B 5.15(4.28) 3.98(4.62) 2.44(1,39) 0.26
BAT Interaction – Post-task STAI-B 3.53(5.42) 2.58(6.10) 1.05(1,37) 0.16
BAT Speech – Latency (seconds) 11.31(17.73) 7.72(10.87) 3.78(1,38) 0.24
BAT Speech – Duration (seconds) 248.13(182.66) 237.20(168.53) 0.53 (1,39) 0.06
BAT Speech – Anticipation STAI-B 8.49(4.56) 7.23(5.18) 1.77 (1,38) 0.26
BAT Speech – Post-task STAI-B 8.21 (5.85) 6.03(6.70) 4.27(1,37)* 0.35

Note. The table shows differences and effect sizes for entire sample from pre- to post-test on all outcome measures using repeated measures analysis of variance. SD = standard deviation; F = F statistic; dfbetween = degrees of freedom between groups; dfwithin = degrees of freedom within groups;

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

AAT = Approach-Avoidance Task; LSAS = Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; SPIN = Social Phobia Inventory; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II; IPSM-29 = Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure, 29-item version; BAT = behavioral approach test; Latency = time taken to begin task; Duration = time spent engaging in task; STAI-B = 8-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, state version. Cohen’s d (estimate of effect size) was calculated using the formula d = Mean1−Mean2/√[(SD12 + SD22)/2], as outlined in Dunlap et al., 1996.