Table 3c.
ORF-WF intercept and growth as predictors of end-of-year reading performance when controlling for beginning-of-year reading performance
Parameter | Familiar |
Novel |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Typical | Struggling-NI | Struggling-I | Typical | Struggling-NI | Struggling-I | |
Passage Comprehension | ||||||
Posttest on | ||||||
Pretest | .71 | .77 | .75 | .66 | .75 | |
Intercept T1 (T5) | .07a (.07a) | .11 (.11) | .05a (.06a) | .14 (.15) | .10 (.10) | |
Slope T1 (T5) | .05a (.03a) | .06a (.03a) | .04a (.02a) | −.08a (−.13a) | .02a (−.01a) | |
Correlation | ||||||
Pretest, Intercept T1 (T5) | .32 (.26) | .39 (.41) | .38 (.36) | .35 (.34) | .38 (.34) | |
Pretest, Slope | −.15a | .06a | .08a | .05a | −.15a | |
Intercept, Slope T1 (T5) | −.06a (.27) | −.11a (.13a) | .19a (.48) | .10a (.41) | −.14a (.15a) | |
Model R-square (%) | 52 | 68 | 61 | 51 | 62 | |
Sight Word Oral Reading Fluency | ||||||
Posttest on | ||||||
Pretest | .45 | .69 | .75 | .61 | .90 | |
Intercept T1 (T5) | .42 (.43) | .28 (.28) | .06a (.06a) | .25 (.27) | .02a (.02a) | |
Slope T1 (T5) | .25 (.11a) | .20 (.13a) | .18 (.16) | .37 (.28) | .53 (.52) | |
Correlation | ||||||
Pretest, Intercept T1 (T5) | .53 (.45) | .79 (.72) | .77 (.74) | .60 (.52) | .74 (.65) | |
Pretest, Slope | −.21 | −.27 | .16a | −.10a | −.30 | |
Intercept, Slope T1 (T5) | −.07a (.27) | −.13a (.13a) | .19a (.48) | .09a (.41) | −.16a (.14a) | |
Model R-square (%) | 58 | 80 | 72 | 72 | 83 |
Note. Estimates standardized. T1, T5 = intercept set at times 1 and 5. Bolded estimates are cases in which slope is a significant predictor. No model was estimated for Novel Struggling-NI students because there was no significant variance in ORF-WL slope among these students (see Table 2c). CFI = 1.0/0.99, RMSEA = .04/.06, SRMR = .02/.02 for Passage Comprehension and Sight Word Oral Reading Fluency, respectively.
Non-significant effects (p > .05).