. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013 Oct 31;26(2):237–247. doi: 10.1007/s10882-013-9359-8

Table 5. Result for the PCQ behavior problems cluster as the test variables Vis-à-Vis dichotomized analog subscale scores.

State variable	AUC^a	Cut-points	Sensitivity	1 - Specificity
BPI-01 SIB (freq.)	.69^*	0.5	.88	.80
		1.5	.68	.40
		2.5	.30	.00
BPI-01 Aggression Destruction (freq.)	.75^**	0.5	.89	.73
		1.5	.70	.20
		2.5	.29	.07
RBS-R SIB	.58	0.5	.91	.79
		1.5	.68	.57
		2.5	.27	.21

AUC Area under the curve

Guidelines for the interpretation of the AUC values: .90–1=excellent; 80–.90=good; 70–.80=fair; .60–.70=poor; .50–.60=fail (Tape 2013, August 21)

p<.05;

^**

p<.001