. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2013 Sep 30;85(2):695–708. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12167

Table 2. Comparison of Latent Regression Models Predicting 7^th Grade Ethnic Pride.

	1	2
Model fit
χ²	135.795^*	228.402 ^***
df	106	143
CFI	0.988	0.968
TLI	0.987	0.962
RMSEA	0.021	0.045

	B (S.E.)	B (S.E.)

Latent Regressions
Mother Cultural Socialization	0.07 (0.03) ^a ^*	0.08 (0.03) ^c ^*
Mother Warmth	−0.02 (0.02) ^b	−0.03 (0.02) ^d
Father Cultural Socialization	0.07 (0.03) ^a ^*	0.08 (0.03) ^c ^*
Father Warmth	−0.02 (0.02) ^b	−0.03 (0.02) ^d
Ethnic Pride 5^th	0.38 (0.06) ^***	0.40 (0.06) ^***
Family Income	---	0.01 (0.01) ^*
Parent Education	---	−0.01 (0.01)
Child Gender ¹	---	−0.07 (0.03) ^*

Note. Non-standardized coefficients shown. CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA = root mean squared error of approximation.

0 = girl; 1 = boy.

^a,b,c,d

Paths constrained to be equal.

p < .05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001.

Table 2. Comparison of Latent Regression Models Predicting 7th Grade Ethnic Pride.