Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Sep 30;42(2):151–159. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12075

Table 4.

Multivariable and mediation analyses of sociodemographic clusters, self-reported behavioral mediators, and clinical oral health status

Direct effects – Odds ratios
Sociodemographic clusters or behaviors % ≥ 5mm probing depth plus BOP (n=94) % BOP (n=92) % Plaque Indexβ score ≥ 2 (n=94) untreated decay (yes/no) (n=94)
Hispanic-Lower-SESc 3.64 (1.69, 8.93)
p=.002
2.49 (1.65, 3.86)
p<.001
1.88 (1.18, 3.10)
p=.009
10.58 (2.67, 40.06)
p=.001
Hispanic-Middling-SESc 2.89 (1.18, 7.00)
p=.020
2.29 (1.39, 3.72)
p=.001
1.35 (0.75, 2.46)
p=.314
3.03 (0.48, 17.10)
p=.364
Other-Higher-SESc 3.93 (1.61, 10.08)
p=.002
2.49 (1.21, 4.57)
p=.008
1.70 (0.88, 3.32)
p=.119
2.04 (.31, 10.83)
p=.432
“Optimal” Oral hygiened a 0.60 (0.39, 0.88)
p=.012
a a
Recent dental visit (6 months)e 0.54 (0.28, 0.94)
p=.051*
a 0.61 (0.41, 0.92)
p=.018
0.26 (0.08, 0.75)
p=.018
Indirect effects mediated by dental visit in last 6 months – Odds ratios
Hispanic-Lower-SES via visit 1.26 (1.01, 1.80) b 1.20 (1.02, 1.49) 1.63 (1.07, 3.16)
Hispanic-Middling-SES via visit 1.35 (1.02, 2.09) b 1.28 (1.03, 1.75) 1.93 (1.09, 4.15)
Other-Higher-SES via visit: 1.13 (0.93, 1.51) b 1.10 (0.95, 1.36) 1.29 (0.86, 2.33)

BOP = Bleeding on probing

β

Silness & Löe Plaque Index

Bold text = significant odds ratios

*

p-value >.05, but bootstrap 95% CI excludes 1.0

a

Potential mediator is not significantly related to the dependent variable

b

Mediation model was not tested because potential mediator was not significantly related to the dependent variable.

c

Reference group = White-Higher-SES

d

Reference group = “Suboptimal” oral hygiene (does not brush at least 2X/day and floss at least once a day)

e

Reference group = No dental visit in past 6 months

“Optimal” = brushes at least 2X/day and flosses at least once a day