Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 22;23(4):846–853. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3157-y

Table 1.

Patient demographic data and clinical outcome

Case no. Age (years) Gender Infection level Diagnosis Odom’s criteria Culture Open surgery
1 49 M L5–S1 Epidural abscess Good No growth 5 months later
2 68 F L4–5, L5–S1 Multilevel infection Good Candida albicans None
3 59 F L2–3 Epidural abscess Excellent Enterococcus faecalis None
4 39 M L3–4 Postoperative infection Good ORSA None
5 41 M L3–4 Paraspinal abscess Good Pseudomonas aeruginosa None
6 40 M L5–S1 Epidural abscess Good Streptococcus viridans None
7 63 M L3–4, L4–5, L5–S1 Multilevel infection Poor Mycobacterium tuberculosis 1 week later
8 65 F L4–5 Postoperative infection Good No growth None
9 87 M L4–5, L5–S1 Multilevel infection Good ORSA None
10 73 F L3–4, L4–5 Multilevel infection Fair Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2 weeks later
11 50 M L2–3 Paraspinal abscess Good OSSA None
12 40 F L4–5 Postoperative infection Good Streptococcus viridans None
13 57 F L5–S1 Epidural abscess Good ORSA None
14 67 M L3–4 Postoperative infection Good OSSA None
15 39 M L5–S1 Postoperative infection Good OSSA None
16 57 M L4–5 Epidural abscess Good OSSA, Escherichia coli None
17 71 M L3–4, L4–5 Multilevel infection Fair Haemophilus influenza 2 weeks later
18 48 M L5–S1 Presacral abscess Good ORSA None
19 52 F L3–4 Paraspinal abscess Good OSSA None
20 62 M L2–3 Paraspinal abscess Excellent ORSA None
21 60 M L3–4 postoperative infection Good ORSA None

M male, F female, L lumbar spine, OSSA oxacillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, ORSA oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus