Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 20;8:24. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00024

Table 4.

Sign and binomial test and 95% confidence interval to determine if those sharks, who did not reach the learning criterion within 30 sessions for single size pairs (Experiment 3a) or the Müller-Lyer deception (Experiment 3b) chose the positive (rewarded) stimulus significantly more often than the negative (unrewarded) stimulus.

Subject Task No. of sessions No. of successful trials One-tail p-value Two-tail p-value The 95% confidence interval extends from
Shark 4 Size ratio 6–3 cm 30 126 0.003** 0.007* 0.3655–0.476
Shark 9 Size ratio 6–3 cm 30 134 0.037* 0.073 0.391–0.503
Shark 2 Size ratio 6–5 cm 30 138 0.092 0.184 0.404–0.517
Shark 6 Size ratio 6–5 cm 30 122 ≤0.001*** 0.002** 0 353–0.463
Shark 8 Size ratio 6–5 cm 30 135 0.047* 0.094 0.375–0.507
Shark 3 Size ratio 6–5.5 cm 30 141 0.163 0.326 0.414–0.526
Shark 5 Size ratio 6–5.5 cm 30 142 0.386 0.386 0.417–0.529
Shark 7 Size ratio 6–5.5 cm 30 137 0.074 0.149 0.421–0.533
Shark 2 Müller-Lyer deception 30 143 0.226 0.453 0.421–0.533
Shark 9 Müller-Lyer deception 30 135 0.047* 0.094 0.375–0.507

p > 0.05 not significant,

(*)

p ≤ 0.05 significant

(**)

p ≤ 0.01 significant

(***)

p ≤ 0.001 significant.