Table 3.
Distribution of in vitro antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from swine at slaughter in Metro Manila.
| Serotype (number tested) |
Number of isolates resistant to the antimicrobial agentsa | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP | AMC | CZ | CXM | CXM AX | FOX | CRO | ETP | GM | TGC | SXT | |
| Choleraesuis (2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Enteritidis (1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Heidelberg (1) | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Typhimurium (8) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Weltevreden (5) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
aAMP: ampicillin; AMC: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CZ: cefazolin; CXM: cefuroxime; CXM AX: cefuroxime axetil; FOX: cefoxitin; CRO: ceftriaxone; ETP: ertapenem; GM: gentamicin; TGC: tigecycline; SXT: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012 [13]).