Table 4.
Distribution of in vivo antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from swine at slaughter in Metro Manila.
| Serotype (number tested) |
Number of isolates resistant to the antimicrobial agentsa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZ | CXM | CXM AX | FOX | CAZ | AN | GM | |
| Agona (3) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Choleraesuis (2) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| Enteritidis (1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Heidelberg (1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Typhimurium (8) | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Weltevreden (5) | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | |
aCZ: cefazolin; CXM: cefuroxime; CXM AX: cefuroxime axetil; FOX: cefoxitin; CAZ: ceftazidime; AN: amikacin; GM: gentamicin (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012 [13]).