TABLE 1.
Concentration of R. rosea aqueous extract, μl/ml medium | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Stressor | 0 | 1 | 5 | 20 |
YPH250 | ||||
10 mM H2O2 | 61±7 | 81±7* | 39±7* | 39±6* |
2 mM Cu2+ | 27±6 | 49±9* | 28±7 | 22±6 |
2 mM Cu2+/4 mM H2O2 | 10±4 | 23±5* | 17±2 | 16±3 |
20% C2H5OH | 14±4 | 11±4 | 7±2 | 10±2 |
200 mM CH3COOH | 65±7 | 80±10 | 78±12 | 91±5* |
Heat shock (40°C) | 54±5 | 70±7* | 66±6 | 57±9 |
YPH250 (Δyap1) | ||||
10 mM H2O2 | 39±6 | 32±7 | 30±6 | NS |
Heat shock (40°C) | 86±11 | 94±3 | 85±5 | NS |
Cells growing exponentially in YPD medium were pre-incubated with R. rosea aqueous extracts during 2 h, and then they were collected and resuspended in 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and exposed to different stressors for 1 h at 28°C, n=5–6.
Significantly different from respective control values with P<0.01 using Student’s t-test. Results are shown as means ± SEM (n = 4–6). NS – not studied.