Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 13;7(4):1088–1096. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.1878

Table III.

Correlation between BRCA1 promoter methylation and clinicopathological features of sporadic EOC patients.

BRCA1 methylation, n (%)

Clinicopathological features n Positive [50 (35.2)] Negative [92 (64.8)] P-valuea
Age at diagnosis (years) 138
 ≤53 79 26 (32.9) 53 (67.1) 0.742
 >53 59 21 (35.6) 38 (64.4)
Menopause state 130
 Pre-menopause 45 13 (28.9) 32 (71.1) 0.318
 Post-menopause 85 32 (37.6) 53 (62.4)
Tumor size (cm) 119
 ≤5.0 15 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7) 0.282
 5–10 53 15 (28.3) 38 (71.7)
 >10 51 22 (43.1) 29 (56.9)
Node metastasis 116
 No 89 31 (34.8) 58 (65.2) 0.834
 Yes 27 10 (37.0) 17 (63.0)
FIGO stage 127
 I–II 31 7 (22.6) 24 (77.4) 0.085
 III–IV 96 38 (39.6) 58 (60.4)
Histological type 130
 Serous 110 38 (34.5) 72 (65.5) 0.506
 Mucinous 12 2 (16.7) 10 (83.3)
 Clear cell 8 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5)
Tumor location 129
 Single side 56 11 (19.6) 45 (80.4) 0.015
 Both sides 73 29 (39.7) 44 (60.3)
CA-125 (U/ml) 89
 35–500 40 9 (22.5) 31 (77.5) 0.013
 500–1000 32 18 (56.2) 14 (43.8)
 >1000 17 7 (41.2) 10 (58.8)
CA19-9 (U/ml) 88
 0–37 67 24 (35.8) 43 (64.2) 0.083
 >37 21 12 (57.1) 9 (42.9)
CEA (U/ml) 79
 0–5 72 20 (27.8) 52 (72.2) 0.191
 >5 7 4 (57.1) 3 (42.9)
a

Obtained from Pearson’s χ2 or Fisher’s exact test.

BRCA1, breast cancer susceptibility gene 1; EOC, epithelial ovarian carcinoma; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; CA, carbohydrate antigen; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.