Table 1.
Description of the included studies.
| No. | Reference | Journal | Type of study | Country | Type of social mediaa | Attitudeb |
| 1 | Abdul, 2011 [38] | Lancet | Correspondence | Taiwan | + | |
| 2 | Adams, 2010 [25] | Int J Med Inf | Review | Netherlands | Social media in general | +/– |
| 3 | Adams, 2011 [26] | Soc Sci Med | Original | United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands | Rating sites | +/– |
| 4 | Bacon, 2009 [39] | BMJ | Opinion paper | United Kingdom | Rating sites | + |
| 5 | Bardach, 2012 [40] | BMJ Qual Saf | Original | United States | Rating sites | + |
| 6 | Black, 2009 [41] | Inform Prim Care | Original | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 7 | Denecke, 2013 [42] | Methods Inf Med | Editorial | n/a | Social media in general | +/– |
| 8 | Emmert, 2012 [27] | Methods Inf Med | Original | Germany | Rating sites | +/– |
| 9 | Emmert, 2013 [43] | J Med Internet Res | Review | n/a | Rating sites | +/– |
| 10 | Galizzi, 2012 [44] | BMJ Open | Original | United Kingdom | Rating sites | +/– |
| 11 | Gao, 2012 [15] | J Med Internet Res | Original | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 12 | Greaves, 2012c[28] | BMJ Qual Saf | Original | United Kingdom | Rating sites | + |
| 13 | Greaves, 2012 [29] | Arch Intern Med | Original | United Kingdom | Rating sites | +/– |
| 14 | Greaves, 2012 [30] | J Med Internet Res | Original | United Kingdom | Rating sites | +/– |
| 15 | Greaves, 2013 [19] | BMJ Qual Saf | Opinion paper | United Kingdom | Social media in general | +/– |
| 16 | Hammond, 2008 [45] | Guidelines in Practice | Opinion paper | n/a | Rating sites | + |
| 17 | Kadry, 2011 [31] | J Med Internet Res | Original | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 18 | Lagu, 2010 [32] | J Gen Intern Med | Original | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 19 | Lopez, 2012 [46] | J Gen Intern Med | Original | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 20 | McCartney, 2009 [47] | BMJ | Opinion paper | United Kingdom | Rating sites | – |
| 21 | Reimann, 2010 [33] | BMC Health Serv Res | Original | n/a | Rating sites | +/– |
| 22 | Rozenblum, 2013 [48] | BMJ Qual Saf | Editorial | n/a | Social media in general | + |
| 23 | Segal, 2012 [34] | J Med Internet Res | Original | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 24 | Strech, 2011 [35] | J Med Internet Res | Opinion paper | n/a | Rating sites | +/– |
| 25 | Tanne, 2013 [36] | BMJ | News item | United States | Rating sites | +/– |
| 26 | Tello, 2013 [49] | Am J Med Qual | Correspondence | Peru | – | |
| 27 | Thielst, 2011 [37] | Front Health Serv Manage | Opinion paper | United States | Social media in general | + |
| 28 | Timian, 2013 [20] | Am J Med Qual | Original | United States | + | |
| 29 | Trigg, 2011 [3] | J Health Serv Res Policy | Essay | n/a | Rating sites | +/– |
aRating sites: various types of health care rating sites like physician rating sites or hospital rating sites.
bA subjective assessment of the authors’ attitude towards the relation between social media and quality of health care (+: positive, +/–: positive with reservations, –: negative).