Table 3.
Questionnaire Results
| Mean Likert scores (maximum score of 5)a | |
|---|---|
| Model feedback | |
| Helpfulnessa | |
| Water bath | 4.2 |
| Transparent maze | 4.7 |
| Imaging kidney stones in human phantom | 4.3 |
| Pushing kidney stones in human phantom | 4.7 |
| Ease of useb | |
| Water bath | 4.4 |
| Transparent maze | 3.4 |
| Imaging kidney stones in human phantom | 3.6 |
| Pushing kidney stones in human phantom | 2.9 |
| Validationc | |
| Content validation—the curriculum was effective for training in | |
| Imaging the kidney | 4.6 |
| Imaging kidney stones | 4.3 |
| Pushing kidney stones | 4.8 |
| Face validation—the curriculum was realistic in | |
| Imaging the kidney | 4.3 |
| Imaging kidney stones | 3.8 |
| Pushing kidney stones | 4.1 |
| The technology is relevant to the practice of urology | 4.9 |
| Urologists should undergo training before using this technology | 4.9 |
a
Graded as 1=not helpful, 2=neutral, 3=slightly helpful, 4=helpful, 5=very helpful.
b
Graded as 1=very difficult, 2=difficult, 3=slightly difficult, 4=easy, 5=very easy.
c
Graded as 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree.