Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;117(3):480–491. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25612

Table 6.

Association of Haplotype Diversity with OS in All Patients

Haplotype* Frequency MST HR (95% CI) P
GCK
  GGCCGCA 0.2337 18.4 1.0
  GGTCGCA 0.1248 16.5 0.96 (0.79–1.18) .73
  GGCTATC 0.1218 16.2 1.21 (0.98–1.48) .078
  GGCCACC 0.098 18.7 0.93 (0.74–1.17) .52
  AACCACC 0.0925 17.6 0.90 (0.72–1.14) .38
  GACCACC 0.0572 17.9 1.22 (0.91–1.63) .18
  Others 0.272 17.3 1.05 (0.88–1.25) .57
GFPT1
  TTTG 0.4165 17.6 1.0
  TTGA 0.2162 17.6 0.97 (0.82–1.13) .66
  TCTG 0.1468 16.0 1.16 (0.97–1.38) .10
  CTGA 0.1288 18.1 0.93 (0.76–1.13) .46
  TTGG 0.0358 15.3 1.20 (0.87–1.66) .26
  Others 0.0559 18.2 0.96 (0.71–1.29) .77
GPI
  TCA 0.808 16.6 1.0
  TGA 0.1154 16.9 0.87 (0.72–1.06) .17
  CGG 0.0555 29.8 0.66 (0.49–0.88) .004
  CCG 0.01 13.0 2.17 (1.16–4.06) .01
  Others 0.0111 37.1 0.64 (0.33–1.25) .19
HK2
  GCCGTGG 0.0817 16.2 1.0
  ATTGTGG 0.0553 16.3 1.01 (0.76–1.34) .93
  GCTATGG 0.0391 25.8 0.62 (0.44–0.88) .007
  ACCATGG 0.0353 23.9 0.85 (0.62–1.17) .33
  ATTACAT 0.0308 13.6 1.42 (1.02–1.96) .03
  ACTATGG 0.0299 27.5 0.95 (0.62–1.47) .83
  GCCGCAT 0.028 11.7 1.46 (0.99–2.14) .055
  ACTGTGG 0.0247 24.6 0.92 (0.58–1.44) .71
  GCCATGG 0.0219 21.5 1.12 (0.64–1.95) .70
  ATTGCAT 0.0214 14.2 1.47 (0.98–2.21) .06
  Others 0.6319 17.3 1.05 (0.87–1.27) .60
OGT
  GA 0.5394 17.8 1.0
  GG 0.3098 15.4 1.09 (0.95–1.24) .23
  AG 0.1201 16.3 1.12 (0.92–1.35) .26
  AA 0.0307 18.2 0.81 (0.54–1.22) .31

MST, median survival time (months); HR: hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

*

Haplotypes of GCK −515G>A, IVS1-11823G>A, IVS1+6037T>C, IVS1+9652C>T, IVS1+11382G>A, IVS3-1489C>T, IVS6+87A>C; GFPT1 IVS12-1764C>T, IVS14-3094T>C, Ex19-115G>T, 4058A>G; GPI IVS6-378T>C, IVS9+2363C>G, G163G; HK2 IVS1-6165G>A, IVS1+7072C>T, IVS2+3581C>T, Ex1+318A>G, Ex15+41C>T (N692N), Ex16-78A>G (L766L), Ex18+407T>G; and OGT IVS8-72G>A and IVS18-424A>G. Three HK2 genotypes were not included in the haplotype analysis because the major allele was present in each of the haplotype group presented.

HR values were from multivariable Cox regression models including sex, race, clinical stage, tumor resection, CA19-9, performance status and biochemical index.

Others include all the haplotypes with an extremely low frequency.