Table 4.
Effect of cross-pollination treatments (within vs. between species, mother species, pin vs. thrum as mother, pin vs. thrum as father) on fruit set, seed production seed viability and viable seeds per flower
Source | F-value | P-value |
---|---|---|
Fruit set* | ||
Within–between species (WvBS) | 1·89 | 0·174 |
Mother species (BvBM) | 38·436 | <0·001 |
Pin/thrum as mother (PvTM) | 0·046 | 0·83 |
Pin/thrum as father (PvTF) | 8·188 | 0·006 |
BvBM × PvTM | 11·099 | 0·001 |
PvTM × PvTF | 327·262 | <0·001 |
WvBS × PvTM | 14·159 | <0·001 |
BvBM × PvTF | 0·234 | 0·63 |
WvBS × BvBM | 33·698 | <0·001 |
WvBS × PvTF | 17·873 | <0·001 |
BvBM × PvTM × PvTF | 1·599 | 0·211 |
WvBS × BvBM × PvTM | 10·645 | 0·002 |
WvBS × PvTM × PvTF | 50·649 | <0·001 |
WvBS × BvBM × PvTF | 1·456 | 0·232 |
WvBS × BvBM × PvTM × PvTF | 0·267 | 0·607 |
Seed number* | ||
WvBS | 0·599 | 0·442 |
BvBM | 28·801 | <0·001 |
PvTM | 3·862 | 0·054 |
PvTF | 2·435 | 0·124 |
BvBM × PvTM | 6·91 | 0·011 |
PvTM × PvTF | 268·517 | <0·001 |
WvBS × PvTM | 2·463 | 0·122 |
BvBM × PvTF | 1·981 | 0·164 |
WvBS × BvBM | 23·689 | <0·001 |
WvBS × PvTF | 1·62 | 0·208 |
BvBM × PvTM × PvTF | 2·868 | 0·095 |
WvBS × BvBM × PvTM | 9·195 | 0·004 |
WvBS × PvTM × PvTF | 62·947 | <0·001 |
WvBS × BvBM × PvTF | 4·179 | 0·045 |
WvBS × BvBM × PvTM × PvTF | 5·127 | 0·027 |
Proportion of viable seed† | ||
WvBS | 15·967 | 0·02 |
BvBM | 30·354 | <0·001 |
PvTM | 2·065 | 0·179 |
PvTF | 0·114 | 0·742 |
Number of viable seed per flower† | ||
WvBS | 10·068 | 0·009 |
BvBM | 18·004 | 0·001 |
PvTM | 0·217 | 0·65 |
PvTF | 0·021 | 0·888 |
*Interactions between ANOVA components are tested using five replicates for each treatment, each replicate comprising a single plant. Nominator d.f. = 1, denominator d.f. = 64.
†Interactions between ANOVA components cannot be tested for these variables because seeds for all five plants were pooled to test for viability. Nominator d.f. = 1, denominator d.f. = 11.