Table 2. Typical examples of best and least predicted folds, superfamilies and families.
Fold/superfamily/family | Distance (Å) | Best Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy1 | Accuracy2 | MCC | LowestAccuracy2 | Method | MCC |
Fold | ||||||||||
NSP3 homodimer (1) | ≤ 3.5 | BindN+ | 93.75 | 89.86 | 90.26 | 91.81 | 0.65 | 60.28 | NAPS | 0.14 |
Ribosomal proteins (2) | ≤ 6.0 | Pprint | 90.62 | 88.73 | 91.40 | 89.68 | 0.79 | 61.60 | RNAProB | 0.32 |
Nucleoplasmin (3) | ≤ 3.5 | RNAProB | 31.11 | 94.79 | 94.09 | 62.95 | 0.22 | 43.81 | RNABindR v2.0 | 0 |
IF3-like (1) | ≤ 6.0 | Pprint | 38.46 | 84.13 | 82.88 | 61.30 | 0.10 | 47.91 | BindN | 0 |
Superfamily | ||||||||||
Rho N-terminal domain(1) | ≤ 3.5 | RNAProB | 100.00 | 97.25 | 97.46 | 98.62 | 0.85 | 49.70 | NAPS | 0 |
tRNA-binding arm (1) | ≤ 6.0 | RNAProB | 88.89 | 99.72 | 99.46 | 94.31 | 0.89 | 61.39 | NAPS | 0.07 |
proRS (1) | ≤ 3.5 | BindN+ | 44.44 | 91.59 | 90.70 | 68.02 | 0.17 | 48.60 | RNAProB | 0 |
Poly A polymerase (1) | ≤ 6.0 | RNABindR v2.0 | 42.86 | 78.82 | 76.61 | 60.84 | 0.12 | 47.87 | BindN+ | 0 |
Family | ||||||||||
SM motif of SNRNP (1) | ≤ 3.5 | RNAProB | 83.33 | 93.94 | 93.06 | 88.63 | 0.65 | 43.94 | BindN+ | 0 |
L23p(1) | ≤ 6.0 | Pprint | 88.57 | 95.65 | 92.59 | 92.11 | 0.85 | 62.86 | RNAProB | 0.41 |
RNB domain (1) | ≤ 3.5 | RNABindR v2.0 | 61.76 | 70.61 | 70.17 | 66.19 | 0.15 | 48.02 | RNAProB | 0 |
Comoviridae (2) | ≤ 6.0 | NAPS | 42.11 | 76.35 | 74.59 | 59.23 | 0.09 | 46.72 | Pprint | 0 |
Accuracy1 = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN).
Accuracy2 = (sensitivity + specificity)/2.