Table 3. Summary of SGA results by GO analysis.
GO Process Slim Term | No. Hits at SGA Score >|0.2|a | P Value at SGA Score >|0.2|b | P Value at SGA Score >|0.25|c | P Value at SGA Score >|0.3|c | P Value at SGA Score >|0.4|c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regulation of cell cycle | 18 | 0.042 | 0.032 | 0.019 | 0.030 |
Cofactor metabolic process | 15 | 0.016 | 0.007 | 0.029 | 0.040 |
Cellular amino acid metabolic process | 20 | 0.062 | 0.064 | 0.060 | 0.055 |
Ion transport | 22 | 0.023 | 0.035 | 0.047 | 0.062 |
Response to chemical stimulus | 31 | 0.033 | 0.045 | 0.046 | 0.068 |
Signaling | 21 | 0.031 | 0.065 | 0.082 | Not enriched |
Protein targeting | 20 | 0.088 | 0.077 | 0.072 | Not enriched |
Carbohydrate metabolic process | 21 | 0.073 | 0.058 | Not enriched | Not enriched |
Transcription from RNAPII promoter | 23 | Not enriched | Not enriched | Not enriched | Not enriched |
Not enriched, P > 0.1. SGA, synthetic genetic array; GO, Gene Ontology; RNAPII, RNA polymerase II.
From Table S2.
Hypergoemetric distributions were calculated from Table S3.
Hypergoemetric distributions were calculated from Saccharomyces Genome Database GO Slim Term analysis using gene lists from Table S2 at the indicated cutoff score.