Abstract
Development of artificial nucleic acids for therapeutic applications warrants that the oligomers be endowed with high specificity, enzymatic stability and with no/reduced off-target effects. The balance between strength of the duplex with target RNA and enzyme stability is therefore the key factor for the designed modification. The chiral serinol derivative combines the attributes of amino- and methoxy- substitution when at 2′- position and at 3′- and 5′- ends, effectively balancing the duplex stability and resistance to hydrolytic enzymes. The biological effect seen is the remarkable improvement in splice correction by the steric blocking antisense oligonucleotide with just 4 modified units, i.e ~20% substitution with R-aminomethoxypropyloxy (R-AMP)-thymidine within the 2′-OMe 18mer sequence.
Keywords: splice correction, steric-blocking, antisense, oligonucleotides
Introduction
Zamecnik and Stephenson discovered the sequence specific biological activity of synthetic antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) with potential in therapeutics in 1978.1 In their pioneering work, it was found that the efficacy of these AONs can be improved by capping the 3′/5′-ends which reduces the susceptibility of AONs toward enzymatic degradation. Tennant et al. had shown earlier in 1973, that nuclease resistant 2′-OMe-poly(A) exhibit higher inhibitory efficacy of over Poly(A) on murine oncornavirus production in tissue culture.2 The chemistry of antisense AONs has progressed immensely over the last 4 decades when several analogs such as phosphorothioates (PS),3 peptide nucleic acids (PNA),4 morpholino nucleic acids (PMO)5 were introduced as linkage modifiers and 2′-O-alkyl6 derivatives such as 2′-OMe and 2′-O-methoxyethyl(MOE), 2′-F,7 ANA,8 LNA9 etc. as sugar modifiers, for endowing nuclease resistance to oligomers as well as allowing increased efficiency of duplex formation (Fig. 1).3,10 In spite of being diastereomeric mixtures at each phosphorus atom, the PS linkages have not yet found replacement because of their favorable pharmacological properties such as increasing half-life and improved binding to serum proteins in vivo, allowing greater availability of AONs to biological targets.11 Several of these chemistries are being mixed in the recent years to gain maximum advantages in terms of reducing off-target effects, increasing specificity and potency of the AONs in various strategies such as RNase-H dependent antisense,3,10,12,13 siRNA,14,15 miRNA16,17or splice switching antisense applications.18 The recent literature also again points out the necessity to protect 3′-5′ ends by enzymatically stable capping of AONs.14,16

Figure 1. Examples of 2′-Sugar modified AONs for potential applications.
It appears that among the plethora of modified AONs currently under evaluation, the promising AONs have some undesirable drawbacks, e.g., phosphorothioate AONs or OMe/LNA mixmers show non-sequence-specific effects due to nonspecific binding to untargeted proteins19 or due to mismatched non-target recognition as a result of very high duplex stability of AON duplexes with target RNA.20 The enzyme resistant phosphorothioate AONs are a mixture of diastereomers at every linker phosphorus atom and the separation of diastereomers is not easy.21 Such AONs also show reduced binding efficiency to RNA. The enzyme resistant LNA analogs22,23 such as c-OMe or c-Et also require several synthetic steps and separation of diastereomers during their synthesis. These shortcomings are indicative of the pressing need for efficient AON analogs that employ relatively simple chemistry, are chirally homogeneous but are still endowed with less toxic off-target effects and have higher efficiencies.
Recently, we designed an ω-O-methylserinol derived 2′-O-(R-2-amino-3-methoxypropyl) (2′-R-AMP) modification of uridine which combines the characteristics of 2′-MOE and 2′-aminopropyl substitution in a stereospecific manner.24 The amino pendant group in the minor grove as in 2′-O-(2-aminoethyl)- substituent was earlier found to be responsible for displacing the essential cations in the hydrolytic enzyme binding site, thus inhibiting the enzyme activity.25 As expected, when (2′-R-AMP) modification was introduced in DNA oligomers, the AONs were found to be as good as 2′-MOE oligomers in terms of efficiency of duplex formation, along with much higher resistance to enzymatic degradation compared with 2′-MOE oligomers.24
In this article, we now present the synthesis of protected-(2-amino-1,3-dihydroxypropyl) monomer unit from l-serine, as a universal serinol cap to the oligomers at 3′, 5′-ends and the 2′-O-R-AMP-ribothymidine monomer to increase the enzymatic resistance of 2′-OMe RNA without disturbing the efficacy of duplex formation. Thymidine is known to show slightly better duplex stability compared with uridine derivatives.26 We further show here that the 3′- and 5′- capped 2′-OMe-AON with ~20% evenly dispersed modified TR-AMP units is as effective as a LNA-OMe mixmer containing ~40% LNA for antisense applications in steric blocking splice correction of an aberrant β-globin gene, using the luciferase reporter system developed by Kole and colleagues.27
Results and Discussion
The synthesis of the universal end-capping monomer 5 and the 2′-O-R-AMP- thymidine monomer 10 is outlined in Scheme 1. The primary hydroxyl group of serine derivative 1 was protected as TBDMS (2a) or DMT (2b) ethers, followed by ester reduction to produce unsymmetrized diols 3a and 3b, carrying respective protecting groups. Compound 3a was then hydrogenated to get a free amine, which was again protected as the TFA derivative (4), and converted into the protected serinol based amidite 5, compatible with solid phase phosphoramidite oligomer synthesis. Alcohol 3b was methylated (6) and was used to functionalize the ribothymidine to get the thymidine derivative 7 via opening of 2,2′-anhydro ring of 2,2′-anhydroribothymidine, as reported earlier for the 2,2′-anhydrouridine.24 The primary hydroxyl group in 7 was protected with DMT (8), the primary amino group protection was changed to TFA (9), and was finally converted to amidite 10 compatible with solid phase phosphoramidite oligomer synthesis. All the new compounds were adequately characterized using NMR and HRMS analysis. The sequences synthesized using the amidites 5 and 10 were used for correction of splicing in thalassemic pre-mRNA by antisense oligonucleotides.28 The sequence DNA1 is a control sequence without any end capping. Sequences DNA1Sa and DNA1Sb correspond to the single and double end capping (by employing monomer 5) at both 3′- and 5′-ends. OMe-RNA is the 2′-OMe derivatised RNA sequence. OMe-RNASa and OMe-RNASb are the single and double serinol capped OMe-RNA sequences, respectively. In the sequence OMe-RNA4-dTSb, four 2′-OMe-uridine residues are replaced by 2′-O-aminomethoxypropyl-ribothymidine derivative 10 (TR-AMP) at defined positions. The sequences thus synthesized are listed in Table 1. The single and double capping of the sequences with the serinol derivative was performed to assess the resistance offered by the capping to phosphodiesterase enzyme. All the sequences were purified by reverse phase HPLC and were characterized by MALDI-ToF mass analysis (Table 1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of universal end cap and R-AMP thymidine monomers.
Table 1. The sequences synthesized, their MALDI-ToF mass analysis and UV Tm values with complementary RNA and RNA with single mismatch.
| No | Sequence and Sequence code | MALDI-ToF mass Cald/Obsd | UV-Tm °C cRNA/mmRNA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CCT CTT ACC TCA GTT ACA (DNA1) | 56.6/50.4 | |
| 2 | S CCT CTT ACC TCA GTT ACA S(DNA1Sa) | 5672.9/5690.3 | 58.3/50.4 |
| 3 | SS CCT CTT ACC TCA GTT ACA SS (DNA1Sb) | 5979.0/6002.0 | 58.4/48.7 |
| 4 | ccu cuu acc uca guu aca (OMe-RNA) | 5823.0/5824.4 | 77.0/66.2 |
| 5 | S ccu cuu acc uca guu aca S (OMe-RNASa) | 6129.0/6151.4 | 78.2/67.9 |
| 6 | SS ccu cuu acc uca guu aca SS (OMe-RNASb) | 6435.1/6453.0 | 76.8/65.4 |
| 7 | SS ccTAMPcuTAMPaccTAMPca guTAMPaca SS(OMe-RNA4-dTSb) | 6786.6/6787.8 | 76.4/64.0 |
cRNA2 ugu aac uga ggu aag agg; mmRNA3 ugu aac ugc ggu aag agg; a/c/g/u RNA or 2′-OMeRNA nucleotides; S is a serinol capping unit; TAMP is a 2′-O-(2-amino-3-methoxypropyl)ribothymidine unit.
We further explored in vitro studies regarding the protection of these newly synthesized oligomers against hydrolytic cleavage and compared the results with unmodified DNA1 and OMe-RNA. We digested these sequences with SVPD under conditions reported earlier.24,29 The products of the digestion were analyzed by RP-HPLC and percent intact AON was plotted against time to understand the degradation pattern for all the oligomers (Fig. 2). The terminal serinol units were able to completely guard the 2′-OMe-RNA oligomers (OMe-RNASa and OMe-RNASb) against hydrolytic cleavage by SVPD for up to 24 h compared with the uncapped DNA or OMe-RNA sequences. After digestion with SVPD for 24h, both the DNA capped sequences DNA1Sa and DNA1Sb were degraded at least 70 and 50%, respectively. Having confirmed the enzymatic stability conferred to these sequences by end capping and 2′-OMe introduction, we studied the effect of these modifications on UV-Tm studies with complementary cRNA2 and single base mismatched mmRNA3. It was observed that the end capping as well as the incorporation of TR-AMP units have negligible effect on the binding efficiency of the 2′-OMe oligomer. The mismatch discrimination was found to be slightly better or equal to the 2′-OMe oligomer (Table 1), indicating that the amino pendant groups do not have any additional non-specific electrostatic interactions with target RNA. The stabilization effect of TR-AMP introduction is comparable to OMe substitution.

Figure 2. Percent intact AON plotted against time.
For biological experiments, to have maximum effects, we chose the sequences OMe-RNASb and OMe-RNA4-dTSb, each having two serinol caps at both 3′- and 5′-ends, which were competent for duplex formation as well as being enzyme-resistant. Cells expressing luciferase pre-mRNA, interrupted by an aberrantly spliced β-globin intron, HeLa pLuc705, were used to monitor the splice-switching activity of the modified oligonucleotides. By using these cells, various AONs have been evaluated by measuring induced luciferase activity as a tool to verify splice switching efficiency and specificity.28 OMe-RNASb and OMe-RNA4-dTSb were used in this study in comparison with OMe-RNA, and also with an LNA-OMe mixmer, previously used in recent steric blocking applications17,30 and the detection was of the expression of functional luciferase in the form of RLU/μg protein expression.
The results shown in Figure 3 clearly indicate that the dose-dependent luciferase expression in the cells treated with serinol-end-capped OMe-RNASb is better than that for the uncapped OMe-RNA. The expression was found to be even better for the sequence OMe-RNA4-dTSb, which was modified further by incorporation of four TR-AMP units (i.e. ~20% substitution of UOMe with 2′-O-TR-AMP). The expression of corrected fluorescent protein was found to be as good as or even slightly better than an LNA/OMe mixmer containing about ~40% LNA substitution. LNA substitution is known to impart very high stability to the duplexes with cRNA (~5 °C/LNA unit).9,31 In addition, LNA/OMe mixmers have been previously reported to show high nuclear steric blocking activity following transfection wheareas OMe-RNA was inactive.30 The present modification, in the sequence OMe-RNA4-dTSb, does not have the advantage/disadvantage of LNA in the context of additive duplex stability per modified unit but nevertheless is still able to show an ability to enter the cell nucleus and give high splice correction activity. As is evident from Figure 3, the end capping of OMe-RNA is not enough to obtain good activity but the interspersed four TR-AMP units enhance the luciferase expression significantly and to a level obtained by as much as seven LNA units, which is remarkable. This could be due to the balanced duplex stability and protection against enzymatic susceptibility endowed by internal TR-AMP units in addition to the end capping. We have also shown by UV-Tm studies, that the single mismatch discrimination is as high as that shown by OMe-RNA oligomer while forming a duplex with the target RNA and therefore off-target effects might also be less compared with the LNA-OMe mixmer sequences, where sometimes mismatched bases in the target RNA can be tolerated.20 The oligomer OMe-RNA4-dTSb with 8 additional amino groups, which partially neutralizes the negative charge, was used also in luciferase activity experiments without transfection agent, but no activity was observed (Please see Supplemental Materials). This is perhaps not surprising since there is still a net negative charge in the oligomer.
Figure 3. Concentration dependent splice correction activity of oligonucleotides (Table 1) in this study. Control cCLucTLuALcCLucALguTLaCLa (LNA/OMe), cTLcuCLuCLaCLcaTLugALcALa (LNA/OMe/scr).
Currently used therapeutic oligomers employ phosphorothioate substitution for avoiding the susceptibility of the oligomers to hydrolytic enzymes and also to enhance cellular and in vivo activity, and it would be interesting to study if our novel strategy of 2′- substitution presented here can be used to improve cell uptake further and possibly even to allow one to avoid (or at least reduce) the requirement for phosphorothioate substitution. The results presented in this article may have implications in other diseases including cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophies, cancers, and several neurological disorders where there are associated mutations affecting the splicing process.3
Materials and Methods
All the non-aqueous reactions were performed under the inert atmosphere of Nitrogen/ Argon and the chemicals used were of laboratory or analytical grade. All solvents used were dried and distilled according to standard protocols. TLCs were performed on pre-coated silica gel GF254 sheets (Merck 5554). All reactions were monitored by TLC and usual work-up implies sequential washing of the organic extract with water and brine followed by drying over anhydrous sodium sulfate and evaporation of the organic layer under vacuum. Column chromatographic separations were performed using silica gel 100‒200 mesh (Merck) or 230‒400 mesh (Merck) and using the solvent systems EtOAc/Petroleum ether and MeOH/DCM. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained using Bruker AC-200, AC-400 or AC-500 NMR spectrometers. The chemical shifts are reported in delta (δ) values and referred to internal standard TMS for 1H. HRMS-mass spectra were recorded on a Finnigan-Matt mass spectrometer. cDNA sequences were synthesized on Bioautomation Mer-Made 4 DNA synthesizer using standard β-cyanoethyl phosphoramidite chemistry. DNA sequences were also analyzed and purified under the same conditions with the increasing gradient of acetonitrile in 0.1N triethylammonium acetate of pH 7.0. The MALDI-TOF spectra were recorded on AB Sciex TOF/TOFTM series explorerTM 72085 instrument; THAP (2, 4, 6-trihydroxyacetophenone) was used as the matrix for DNA samples characterization. Thermal denaturation experiments were performed on Varian Cary-300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer fitted with a peltier-controlled temperature programmer and a water circulator, at the temperature ramping 0.5 °C/min and the absorbance is recorded at 260 nm for every 0.5 °C rise in temperature. OMe-RNA/LNA and OMe-RNA/LNA/scr oligomers were obtained from RiboTask ApS, Odense, Denmark.
Methyl N-[(benzyloxy)carbonyl]-O-dimethoxytrityl-L-serinate 2a
N-Cbz-l-serine methyl ester 1 (19.7 mmol, 5.0 g) was dissolved in dry pyridine (25 mL) and DMT-Cl (21.6 mmol, 7.3 g) and catalytic amount of DMAP (~30 mg) were added. Reaction mixture was kept for stirring at room temperature for 4 h. Pyridine was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was diluted with EtOAc. 10% aqueous NaHCO3, water and brine solution wash were given to the organic layer. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to dryness. Crude compound was column purified (eluted in 20% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to get 2a as a pale thick liquid in 91% yield.1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 3.34–3.39 (dd, 1H, J = 2.65 and 9.09 Hz), 3.54–3.60 (dd, 1H, J = 2.78 and 9.09 Hz), 3.76 (s, 9H), 5.11 (s, 2H), 5.67 (d, 1H, J = 8.59 Hz), 6.78–6.82 (m, 4H), 7.22 (m, 5H), 7.34 (m, 9H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 52.0, 54.2, 54.8, 63.3, 66.6, 77.2, 85.7, 112.9, 126.6, 127.6, 127.68, 128.2, 128.9, 129.6, 135.1, 35.2, 136.0, 144.1, 155.6, 158.3, 170.8 HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C33H33O7NNa (M+Na) 578.2149, found 578.2148.
Benzyl (R)-(1-[(dimethoxytrityl)oxy]-3-hydroxypropan-2-yl)carbamate 3a
Compound 2a (18.0 mmol, 10 g) was dissolved in MeOH (500 mL) and NaBH4 (72 mmol, 2.7 g) was added fraction-wise at 0 °C for a period of 40 min and the mixture was kept for stirring at room temperature for another 6–8 h. Excess NaBH4 was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution, followed by the removal of MeOH under reduced pressure. The crude reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The organic extract was washed with brine solution and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. EtOAc was removed under reduced pressure to give the crude product and was purified through column chromatography (eluted in 25–30% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to yield 3a as a colorless liquid in 85% (7.8 g).1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 2.39 (bs, 1H), 3.29 (d, 2H, J = 3.67 Hz), 3.73–3.79 (m, 8H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 5.32 (d, 1H, J = 7.58 Hz), 6.79–6.84 (m, 4H), 7.15–7.40 (m, 14H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 52.5, 54.9, 62.9, 66.6, 86.2, 113.0, 126.7, 127.7, 127.8, 128.3, 129.7, 130.5, 136.2, 144.4, 156.3, 158.3. HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C32H33O6NNa (M+Na) 550.2200, found 550.2198.
(R)-N-(1-[(dimethoxytrityl)oxy]-3-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2,2,2-trifluoroacetamide 4
Compound 3a (8.7 mmol, 4.6 g) was dissolved in MeOH (20 mL) followed by the addition of 10% Pd-C (10% w/w, 0.46 g). The reaction mixture was subjected to catalytic hydrogenation at 60 psi of hydrogen pressure for 5 h. After the TLC analysis, reaction mixture was filtered over celite and the removal of methanol in vacuo gave free amine. Without further purification amine was subjected to trifluoroacetyl protection. To the crude amine (8.4 mmol, 3.3 g) dissolved in MeOH (30 mL), NEt3 (12.7 mmol, 1.7 mL) was added. Ethyltrifluoroacetate (10.1 mmol, 1.2 mL) was added to reaction mixture and the mixture was kept for stirring at room temperature for 8h. MeOH was removed on rota evaporator and the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with water and 5% aq. NaHCO3 and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, concentrated in vacuo. Crude compound was subjected to column purification to furnish 4 (eluted in 17% EtOAc in petroleum ether) in 86% yield over two steps. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 2.39 (bs, 1H), 3.37(d, 2H, J = 4.42 Hz), 3.68–3.75 (m, 1H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.83–3.90 (m, 1H), 4.05–4.14 (p, 1H), 6.82–6.86 (m, 4H), 7.26–7.40 (m, 9H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ 51.4, 55.0, 61.9, 62.1, 77.2, 86.5, 113.2, 126.9, 127.7, 127.9, 129.7, 135.2, 144.1, 158.5. HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C26H26O5NF3Na (M+Na) 512.1655, found 512.1653.
Serinol derived phosphoramidite 5
To the compound 4 (2.0 mmol, 1 g) dissolved in dry DCM (12 mL), DIPEA (3.6 mmol, 0.6 mL) was added. 2-cyanoethyl-N,N,-diisopropyl-chlorophosphine (2.4 mmol, 0.5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture at 0 °C and continued stirring at room temperature for 1.5 h. The contents were diluted with DCM and washed with 5% NaHCO3 solution. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated. The residue was re-dissolved in DCM and the compound was precipitated with n-hexane to obtain corresponding phosphoramidite 5 in 85% yield. 31P NMR (Acetonitrile, D2O as external standard, 160 MHz): δ 149.17, 149.20. HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C35H43O6N3F3PNa (M+Na) 712.2734, found 712.2728.
Benzyl (R)-(1-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-3-hydroxypropan-2-yl)carbamate 3b
N-Cbz protected-l-serine-methyl ester 1 (39.5 mmol, 10 g) was dissolved in dry DCM (200 mL), followed by the addition of imidazole (98.8 mmol, 6.7 g) and TBS-Cl (47.4 mmol, 7.1 g). The reaction mixture was diluted with DCM and water wash, brine wash were given. Organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and solvent was removed under reduced pressure to result the crude TBS protected ester, which was subjected NaBH4 reduction. The residue was dissolved in methanol (500 mL) and cooled to 0 °C, was added NaBH4 (150 mmol, 5.6 g) fraction wise for a period of 1 h and then continued stirring at room temperature for another 6 h. Excess NaBH4 was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution, followed by the removal of MeOH under reduced pressure and extracted with EtOAc. The organic extract was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. EtOAc was removed under reduced pressure to give the crude product and was purified through column chromatography (eluted in 15% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to yield 3b in 87% (11.6 g) over two steps. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 0.05 (s, 6H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 2.64 (bs, 1H), 3.66–3.84 (m, 5H), 5.11 (s, 2H), 5.38–5.41 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.38 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): δ -5.6, 18.1, 25.7, 53.0, 63.0, 63.4, 66.7, 128.0, 128.4, 136.2, 158.2. HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C17H30O4NSi (M+H) 340.1939, found 340.1945.
Benzyl (R)-(1-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]-3-methoxypropan-2-yl)carbamate 6
To a stirred solution of 3b (29.4 mmol, 10 g) and MeI (147.4 mmol, 9.5 mL) was added Ag2O (73.5 mmol, 16.9 g). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h, filtered and filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. Crude compound was purified through column chromatography (eluted in 5% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to result 6 in 91% (9.4 g) yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): δ 0.05 (s, 6H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.37–3.77(m, 4H), 3.78–3.86(m, 1H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 7.35–7.38 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ -5.6, 18.1, 25.7, 51.5, 58.8, 61.3, 66.6, 70.4, 128.0, 128.4, 136.4, 155.9. HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C18H32O4NSi (M+H) 354.2095, found 354.2089
2′-functionalization of 2,2′-anhydroribothymidine 7
Desiccated 2,2′-anhydrothymidine (6.2 mmol, 1.5 g) was dissolved in dry DMA (10 mL) followed by the addition of BF3.OEt2 (12.5 mmol, 1.5 mL) under argon atmosphere. After 2 min the –TBS protected silyl ether 5 (18.7 mmol, 6.6 g) was added and stirred at 130 °C for 8 h. DMA was removed partially on rota evaporator followed by the dilution with MeOH, the reaction mixture was then column purified (eluted in 75% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to yield 65% of 7 as white solid. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δH 1.83 (s, 3H), 2.06 (s, DMA, COCH3), 2.91(s, 3H), 2.99(s, 3H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 3.47 (m, 2H), 3.65–4.12 (m, 10H), 4.29 (m, 1H), 5.06 (s, 2H), 5.77 (d, J = 3.22 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (m, 5H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 9.97 (bs, 1H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δC 12.1, 21.2 (DMA, -CH3), 29.4, 35.0, 37.8(DMA, -N-CH3), 49.9, 58.7, 60.4, 66.5, 68.3, 69.7, 71.1, 77.2, 82.1, 84.4, 88.1, 110.4, 127.7, 127.8, 128.2, 136.1, 136.8, 150.5, 156.3, 164.3, 171.0 (DMA, -CO); HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C22H29N3O9Na (M+Na) 502.1796, found 502.1800
5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[N-benzyloxycarbonyl-2′-O-R-(2-amino-3-methoxypropyl)] ribothymidine 8
2′-O-functionalized ribothymidine 7 (3.0 mmol, 1.5 g) dissolved in dry pyridine (10 mL) and was added DMT-Cl (3.3 mmol, 1.1 g) and catalytic amount of DMAP (~20 mg). Reaction mixture kept for stirring at room temperature for 5–6 h. Pyridine was removed under reduced pressure and the residue dissolved in EtOAc. 10% aqueous NaHCO3, water and brine wash were given to the organic layer. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to dryness. Crude compound was column purified (eluted in 60% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to result 8 in 81% yield as a white foam. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δH 1.36 (s, 3H), 3.34 (s, 3H), 3.37–3.58 (m, 5H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.97–4.09 (4H), 4.41 (m, 2H), 5.09 (s, 2H), 6.81 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.65 (m, 12H), 7.65 (s, 1H), 9.51 (bs, 1H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δC 11.7, 29.6, 50.1, 55.1, 59.0, 62.1, 66.8, 68.9, 70.7, 71.5, 77.2, 82.9, 83.5, 86.8, 87.1, 111.0, 113.2, 127.0, 127.9, 128.1, 128.4, 130.0, 135.2, 136.2, 144.2, 150.4, 156.2, 158.6, 164.0; HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C43H47N3O11Na (M+Na) 804.3103, found 804.3105
5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-(N-trifluoroacetyl-2′-O-R-(2-amino-3-methoxypropyl)) ribothymidine 9
The 5′-DMT protected 2′-O-functionalized thymidine derivative 8 (2.6 mmol, 2.1 g) was dissolved in MeOH (15 mL) and was added 10% Pd-C (10% w/w, 0.21 g). Then reaction mixture was subjected to catalytic hydrogenation at 65 psi of hydrogen pressure for 5 h. After the TLC analysis Pd-C was removed by filtration over celite and concentration of the filtrate in vacuo gave free amine. Without further purification amine was subjected to trifluoroacetyl protection. Crude amine (2.5 mmol, 1.6 g) was dissolved in MeOH (15 mL), followed by the addition of NEt3 (3.7 mmol, 0.54 mL). Ethyltrifluoroacetate was added and the reaction mixture kept for stirring at room temperature for 10 h. MeOH was removed on rota evaporator and the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc. To the EtOAc containing reaction mixture gave water wash and 5% aq. NaHCO3 wash. Organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 concentrated in vacuo. Crude compound was column purified (eluted in 60% EtOAc in petroleum ether) to yield 9 in 78% over two steps as a white foam. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δH 1.36 (s, 3H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 3.45–3.54 (m, 2H), 3.59 (d, J = 4.55 Hz), 3.79 (s, 6H), 3.84–3.89 (m, 1H), 4.00–4.11 (m, 3H), 4.31–4.49 (m, 2H), 5.95 (d, J = 2.91 Hz), 6.81 (m, 4H), 7.27–7.51 (m, 9H), 7.69 (s, 1H), 9.44 (bs, 1H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) δC 11.7, 49.3, 55.2, 59.1, 61.9, 68.8, 69.5, 70.5, 83.1, 83.5, 86.8, 87.3, 111.4, 113.1, 113.2, 127.1, 127.7, 127.7, 128.0, 129.0, 130.0, 135.0, 135.2, 144.2, 150.9, 158.6, 163.8; HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C37H40F3N3O10Na (M+Na) 766.2558, found 766.2561.
Phosphoramidite 10
To a solution of 9 (1.3 mmol, 1 g) in dry DCM (15 mL) was added DIPEA (5.8 mmol, 1.0 mL). 2-cyanoethyl-N,N,-diisopropyl-chloro phosphine (1.6 mmol, 0.35 mL) was added to the solution at 0 °C and reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The contents were then diluted with DCM and washed with 5% NaHCO3 solution. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to foam. The residue was redissolved in DCM and precipitated with n-hexane to yield corresponding phosphoramidite 10 in 82% as white foam. 31P NMR (Acetonitrile, D2O as external standard, 400 MHz): δ 149.22, 149.68. HRMS (EI) Mass calculated for C46H58F3N5O11P (M+H) 944.3817, found 944.3824.
Supplementary Material
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
Kumar VA thanks CSIR, New Delhi for financial support for this work at CSIR-NCL, Pune (Genecode BSC0123). Kotikam V thanks CSIR, New Delhi, for research fellowship. Gait MJ acknowledges that work in the Cambridge laboratory was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC program no. U105178803). Kumar VA and Gait MJ thank funding from Wellcome Trust, UK for a joint collaborative project (WT085756MF).
Glossary
Abbreviation:
- TR-AMP
2′-(R)-aminomethoxypropyloxy-thymidine
- AONs
antisense oligonucleotides
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/artificialdna/article/27279
References
- 1.Zamecnik PC, Stephenson ML. Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virus replication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:280–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tennant RW, Farrelly JG, Ihle JN, Pal BC, Kenney FT, Brown A. Effects of polyadenylic acids on functions of murine RNA tumor viruses. J Virol. 1973;12:1216–25. doi: 10.1128/jvi.12.6.1216-1225.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kole R, Krainer AR, Altman S. RNA therapeutics: beyond RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotides. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:125–40. doi: 10.1038/nrd3625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O. Sequence-selective recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thymine-substituted polyamide. Science. 1991;254:1497–500. doi: 10.1126/science.1962210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Summerton J, Weller D. Morpholino antisense oligomers: design, preparation, and properties. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1997;7:187–95. doi: 10.1089/oli.1.1997.7.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin P. A new access to 2′-O-alkylated ribonucleosides and properties of 2′-O-alkylated oligoribonucleotides. Helv Chim Acta. 1995;78:486–504. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19950780219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Williams DM, Benseler F, Eckstein F. Properties of 2′-fluorothymidine-containing oligonucleotides: interaction with restriction endonuclease EcoRV. Biochemistry. 1991;30:4001–9. doi: 10.1021/bi00230a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Damha MJ, Wilds CJ, Noronha A, Brukner I, Borkow G, Arion D, Parniak MA. Hybrids of RNA and arabinonucleic acids (ANA and 2′-F-ANA) are substrates of ribonuclease H. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:12976–7. doi: 10.1021/ja982325+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Koshkin AA, Singh SK, Nielsen P, Rajwanshi VK, Kumar R, Meldgaard M, Olsen CE, Wengel J. LNA (locked nucleic acids): synthesis of the adenine, cytosine, guanine, 5-methylcytosine, thymine and uracil bicyclonucleoside monomers, oligomerisation, and unprecedented nucleic acid recognition. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:3607–30. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)00094-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Watts JK, Corey DR. Silencing disease genes in the laboratory and the clinic. J Pathol. 2012;226:365–79. doi: 10.1002/path.2993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bennett CF, Swayze EE. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:259–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Geary RS, Yu RZ, Levin AA. Pharmacokinetics of phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2001;2:562–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu H, Lima WF, Zhang H, Fan A, Sun H, Crooke ST. Determination of the role of the human RNase H1 in the pharmacology of DNA-like antisense drugs. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:17181–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311683200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lima WF, Prakash TP, Murray HM, Kinberger GA, Li W, Chappell AE, Li CS, Murray SF, Gaus H, Seth PP, et al. Single-stranded siRNAs activate RNAi in animals. Cell. 2012;150:883–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deleavey GF, Watts JK, Alain T, Robert F, Kalota A, Aishwarya V, Pelletier J, Gewirtz AM, Sonenberg N, Damha MJ. Synergistic effects between analogs of DNA and RNA improve the potency of siRNA-mediated gene silencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4547–57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blechinger J, Pieper H, Marzenell P, Kovbasyuk L, Serva A, Starkuviene V, Erfle H, Mokhir A. Short, terminally modified 2′-OMe RNAs as inhibitors of microRNA. Chem Commun (Camb) 2013;49:7397–9. doi: 10.1039/c3cc43174f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fabani MM, Gait MJ. miR-122 targeting with LNA/2′-O-methyl oligonucleotide mixmers, peptide nucleic acids (PNA), and PNA-peptide conjugates. RNA. 2008;14:336–46. doi: 10.1261/rna.844108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bauman J, Jearawiriyapaisarn N, Kole R. Therapeutic potential of splice-switching oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotides. 2009;19:1–13. doi: 10.1089/oli.2008.0161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bhan P, Bhan A, Hong M, Hartwell JG, Saunders JM, Hoke GD. 2′,5′-linked oligo-3′-deoxyribonucleoside phosphorothioate chimeras: thermal stability and antisense inhibition of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3310–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.16.3310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guterstam P, Lindgren M, Johansson H, Tedebark U, Wengel J, El Andaloussi S, Langel U. Splice-switching efficiency and specificity for oligonucleotides with locked nucleic acid monomers. Biochem J. 2008;412:307–13. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thayer JR, Wu Y, Hansen E, Angelino MD, Rao S. Separation of oligonucleotide phosphorothioate diastereoisomers by pellicular anion-exchange chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:802–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Seth PP, Vasquez G, Allerson CA, Berdeja A, Gaus H, Kinberger GA, Prakash TP, Migawa MT, Bhat B, Swayze EE. Synthesis and biophysical evaluation of 2′,4′-constrained 2′O-methoxyethyl and 2′,4′-constrained 2′O-ethyl nucleic acid analogues. J Org Chem. 2010;75:1569–81. doi: 10.1021/jo902560f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hari Y, Morikawa T, Osawa T, Obika S. Synthesis and properties of 2′-O,4′-C-ethyleneoxy bridged 5-methyluridine. Org Lett. 2013;15:3702–5. doi: 10.1021/ol401566r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kotikam V, Kumar VA. Synthesis and properties of 2′-O-[R- and S-(2-amino-3-methoxy)propyl] (R-AMP and S-AMP) nucleic acids. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:6404–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.05.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Teplova M, Wallace ST, Tereshko V, Minasov G, Symons AM, Cook PD, Manoharan M, Egli M. Structural origins of the exonuclease resistance of a zwitterionic RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:14240–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sugimoto N, Nakano M, Nakano S. Thermodynamics-structure relationship of single mismatches in RNA/DNA duplexes. Biochemistry. 2000;39:11270–81. doi: 10.1021/bi000819p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kang SH, Cho MJ, Kole R. Up-regulation of luciferase gene expression with antisense oligonucleotides: implications and applications in functional assay development. Biochemistry. 1998;37:6235–9. doi: 10.1021/bi980300h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dominski Z, Kole R. Restoration of correct splicing in thalassemic pre-mRNA by antisense oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:8673–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prakash TP, Manoharan M, Kawasaki AM, Fraser AS, Lesnik EA, Sioufi N, Leeds JM, Teplova M, Egli M. 2′-O-[2-(methylthio)ethyl]-modified oligonucleotide: an analogue of 2′-O-[2-(methoxy)-ethyl]-modified oligonucleotide with improved protein binding properties and high binding affinity to target RNA. Biochemistry. 2002;41:11642–8. doi: 10.1021/bi020264t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arzumanov A, Walsh AP, Rajwanshi VK, Kumar R, Wengel J, Gait MJ. Inhibition of HIV-1 Tat-dependent trans activation by steric block chimeric 2′-O-methyl/LNA oligoribonucleotides. Biochemistry. 2001;40:14645–54. doi: 10.1021/bi011279e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kumar R, Singh SK, Koshkin AA, Rajwanshi VK, Meldgaard M, Wengel J. The first analogues of LNA (locked nucleic acids): phosphorothioate-LNA and 2′-thio-LNA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:2219–22. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(98)00366-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


