Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep 23;40(2):467–475. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24394

Table 1.

Comparison of the results of the LDS algorithm and radiologist’s segmentation, LDS algorithm and CADstream output, CADstream output and radiologist’s segmentation.

LDS and Rad. Seg. LDS and CADstream CADstream and Rad. Seg.
Accuracy 90% 82.1% 79.3%
Sensitivity 100% 100% 85.1%
DSC 0.77 0.72 0.66