Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;121(12):2787–2793. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23012

Table I. Association of HPV Viral Load with Prevalent ≥Cin2.

HPV risk group Qualitative viral load1 Single HPV infections Single and multiple HPV infections2


N (cases/controls)3 OR (95% CI) N (cases/controls) OR (95% CI)
All infections Low (1–3) 6/646 ref. 8/893 ref.
High (4–5) 57/587 10.4 (4.5–24.4) 114/977 13.0 (6.3–26.8)
Carcinogenic4 Low (1–3) 4/269 ref. 6/451 ref.
High (4–5) 55/272 13.6 (4.9–38.0) 108/558 14.5 (6.3–33.4)
HPV16+ Low (1–3) 2/64 ref. 4/110 ref.
High (4–5) 36/60 19.2 (4.4–83.2) 58/130 12.3 (4.3–34.8)
Carcinogenic, HPV16- Low (1–3) 2/205 ref. 3/353 ref.
High (4–5) 19/212 9.2 (2.1–39.9) 49/416 13.9 (4.3–44.8)
Noncarcinogenic Low (1–3) 2/377 ref. 2/442 ref.
High (4–5) 2/315 1.2 (0.2–8.5) 6/419 3.2 (0.6–15.8)

HPV, human papillomavirus; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

1

Viral load for HPV groups and species reflects type-specific HPV PCR probes. Parentheses indicate range of PCR signal strength indices.

2

For multiple infections, we utilized the maximum signal intensity value of any carcinogenic HPV type, if such a type was present and the maximum signal intensity value among the noncarcinogenic types for women with noncarcinogenic types only.

3

Cases were women with prevalent CIN2 or worse at enrollment. Controls were women with prevalent CIN1 or better at enrollment.

4

For women with multiple HPV types, women had to have had at least one carcinogenic HPV type to be categorized as ‘Carcinogenic.’