Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 4;5(3):221–230. doi: 10.7150/jca.7691

Table 4.

Relative hazard according to the number of elevated serum markers (n = 64).

Variable Number of elevated markers No. of patients Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Relative hazard 95% CI P-value* Relative hazard 95% CI P-value*
Serum endocan and AFP 0 13 1 1
1 34 4.22 0.55-32.62 0.168 2.66 0.32-21.99 0.364
2 17 21.90 2.82-170.29 0.003 12.07 1.41-103.66 0.023
Serum endocan and DCP 0 or 1 29 1 1
2 35 4.06 1.75-9.39 0.001 4.26 1.63-11.14 0.003
Serum endocan, AFP, and DCP 0 or 1 24 1 1
2 24 2.19 0.78-6.17 0.137 1.90 0.64-5.62 0.246
3 16 14.63 4.82-44.43 <0.0001 10.31 2.64-40.23 0.001

CI, confidence interval; AFP, α-fetoprotein; DCP, des-γ-carboxy prothrombin.

* Cox proportional hazard model. Variables assessed in the multivariate analysis included age (< 70 years vs. ≥ 70 years), gender (female vs. male), etiology of liver disease (non-viral vs. viral), tumor stage (stage I/II vs. III/IV), Child-Pugh grade (A vs. B/C), treatment option, and number of elevated markers.