Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;2014:425787. doi: 10.1155/2014/425787

Table 1.

Randomized controlled trials using patient reminders as interventional strategy.

Author (yr) Aim Intervention Participants (n) Participation, n (%) Follow-up (months)
Church et al. (2004) [17] Any screening test after intervention Group 1: mailed FOBT and educational brochure 1255 13.2* 12
Group 2: same as Group 1 and phone call reminder 14.1
Group 3: just mailed FOBT 7.8

Segnan et al. (2005) [18] Screening FS or FOBT after intervention Group 1: mailed invitation to biennial FOBT, FOBT, instructions, educational leaflet, 2 reminder letters 26682 30 24
Group 2: biennial FOBT delivered by the PCP or screening facility 28
Group 3: same as Group 1 and invitation to choose between FOBT and once only FS 27
Group 4: same as Group 1 and mailed invitation to FS 28
Group 5: same as Group 1 and invitation to FS followed by biennial FOBT 28

Denberg et al. (2006) [19] Screening colonoscopy after intervention Group 1: mailed educational brochure with reminder after primary care visit 781 70.7* 4
Group 2: usual care 59

Myers et al. (2007) [20] FOBT screening after intervention Group 1: mailed letter, information booklet, FOBT, reminder letter 1546 46* 24
Group 2: same as Group 1 and tailored message pages 44
Group 3: same as Group 2 and reminder phone call 48
Group 4: usual care 33

Chan and Vernon (2008) [21] FOBT screening after intervention Group 1 (home e-mail access): e-mailed reminders, FOBT, last screening results, and link for additional information 97 26 18
Group 2 (home e-mail access): usual care 23
Group 3 (public library access): same as Group 1 0
Group 4 (public library access): same as Group 2 33

Sequist et al. (2009) [22] Any screening test after intervention Group 1: educational pamphlet, mailed FOBT with a stamped return envelope, telephone number to schedule colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy, and mailed reminder 21860 44* 15
Group 2: usual care 38.1

Lee et al. (2009) [23] FOBT screening after intervention Group 1: mailed educational reminder and FOBT 775 64.4* 6
Group 2: usual care 48.4

Sequist et al. (2011) [24] Any screening test after intervention Group 1: electronic reminders, educational information, and link for additional information 1103 15.8 4
Group 2: usual care 13.1

Cameron et al. (2011) [25] Any screening test after intervention Group 1: reminder letter, educational brochure, educational digital video disc, and phone call reminder 628 18.2* 6
Group 2: usual care 12.1

Coronado et al. (2011) [26] Screening FOBT after intervention Group 1: usual care 501 2* 9
Group 2: mailed FOBT and instructions 26
Group 3: same as Group 2, phone call reminder and home visit by trained community members addressing strategies for CRC screening and definition of CRC 31

Doorenbos et al. (2011) [27] Any screening test after intervention Group 1: reminders and e-mailed calendar with messages of CRC screening 5633 4.1 15
Group 2: calendar without any messages 4.4

Leffler et al. (2011) [28] Screening colonoscopy after intervention Group 1: automated reminder system (3 reminders) 830 33.5* 6
Group 2: usual care 17.8

*Intervention groups increased CRC screening rates compared with the usual care.