Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 12;4(3):e004494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004494

Table 4.

Association between mailed invitation and FOBT completion or mailed invitation and FOBT or colonoscopy completion after adjusting for physician factors

FOBT completion
FOBT or colonoscopy completion
OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
Mailed invitation
 Yes (Pilot) 3.3 (3.1 to 3.6) <0.0001 2.7 (2.5 to 2.9) <0.0001
 No (controls) Reference NA Reference NA
 Increasing age (per year) 1.0 (1.0 to 1.0) NS 1.0 (1.0 to 1.0) 0.03
Sex, N (%)
 Female 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1) NS 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1) NS
 Male Reference NA Reference NA
Practice type, N (%)
 FHG 0.7 (0.6 to 0.8) <0.0001 0.7 (0.7 to 0.8) <0.0001
 FHO/FHN 0.8 (0.7 to 0.9) <0.0001 0.8 (0.7 to 0.9) <0.0001
 Other PEM 0.8 (0.7 to 1.0) 0.03 0.8 (0.7 to 1.0) NS
 FHO/FHN-FHT Reference NA Reference NA
Practice size (enrolled patients)
 ≤1800 patients 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3) 0.0004 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3) <0.0001
 >1800 patients Reference NA Reference NA

FHG, family health group; FHO/FHN, family health organisations or networks; FHT, family health team; FOBT, faecal occult blood test; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; Other PEM, other patient enrolled model of care.