Table 3. Results of multivariate two-steps hierarchical modeling for relationship between functional status with psychological factors and baseline characteristics .
Adjusted | ||||
Variables | B | SE | Beta | P -value |
First Step Hierarchical Model | ||||
Education | ||||
Elementary | Referent | |||
Secondary | -6.78 | 5.08 | -0.13 | 0.185 |
High School | -10.67 | 4.30 | -0.27 | 0.015 |
Literacy Level | -8.73 | 4.54 | -0.20 | 0.058 |
Insurance | ||||
Medical Services | Referent | |||
Social Security | -1.94 | 3.61 | -0.05 | 0.592 |
Other | -9.77 | 5.38 | -0.18 | 0.073 |
Second Step Hierarchical model | ||||
Vulnerability | -0.10 | 0.05 | -0.19 | 0.065 |
Severity | -0.90 | 0.71 | -0.18 | 0.208 |
Health Beliefs | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.09 | 0.554 |
Cardiac self-efficacy | 1.67 | 0.40 | 0.44 | <0.001 |
Anxiety | ---- a | |||
State- anxiety | 0.02 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.924 |
Trait-anxiety | -0.22 | 0.24 | -0.11 | 0.380 |
Dependent Variable: functional status/ R Square for the first part = 13.6%, R Square for the second part = 18.7%, Total R Square = 32.3%/ There was significant predictive ability of second part of the model (F Change (5, 181) = 4.48, P=0.001)/ a: Anxiety was removed by modeling itself, because of severe collinearity