Table 2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model Fit Results.
| Model/Fit Index | Full Sample (n = 646) |
Restrictive Setting (n = 369) |
Less Restrictive Setting (n = 277) |
North American Adolescents (n = 285) |
European Adolescents (n = 361) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-factor | |||||
| χ2 (df) | 219.87 (45) | 133.573 (42) | 117.612 (37) | 86.264 (40) | 128.401 (40) |
| CFI | 0.922 | 0.897 | 0.922 | 0.956 | 0.925 |
| TLI | 0.955 | 0.921 | 0.956 | 0.978 | 0.947 |
| RMSEA | 0.078 | 0.077 | 0.089 | 0.064 | 0.078 |
| SRMR | 0.060 | 0.072 | 0.073 | 0.058 | 0.069 |
| Four-factor | |||||
| χ2 (df) | 367.64 (79) | 270.719 (68) | 196.994 (61) | 146.633 (70) | 254.718 (63) |
| CFI | 0.906 | 0.825 | 0.909 | 0.942 | 0.890 |
| TLI | 0.952 | 0.874 | 0.949 | 0.974 | 0.930 |
| RMSEA | 0.075 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.062 | 0.092 |
| SRMR | 0.063 | 0.087 | 0.080 | 0.063 | 0.083 |
Note. CFI = Comparative Fit Index ( > .90); TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index ( > .90); RMSEA =Root Mean Square Error of Approximation ( < .10); SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Square Residual ( < .10). Values considered at least fair to acceptable are shown in boldface type; cutoffs for values indicating at least fair to acceptable fit are listed in parentheses in this note. In this table, restrictive setting refers to youth facilities providing long-term incarceration, whereas less restrictive settings include probation, short-term detention, and clinic settings.