Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Oct;195(4):858–864. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3766

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Septocutaneous perforator.

A–H, Sagittal (A–D) and axial (E–H) maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) (3 mm thick) images show septocutaneous perforator (arrow) on sagittal MIPs from subtraction and source data from bolus-chase MR angiograms (A and B, respectively) and time-resolved MR angiograms (C and D). Same septocutaneous perforator is evident on axial MIPs from subtraction and source data from bolus-chase MR angiogram (E and F) and time-resolved MR angiograms (G and H). Structures surrounding perforator can be identified on source images, which help in location of path of septocutaneous perforator. Contrast between septocutaneous perforator and surrounding soft tissues is relatively low on unsubtracted time-resolved MR angiograms. A–H, Sagittal (A–D) and axial (E–H) maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) (3 mm thick) images show septocutaneous perforator (arrow) on sagittal MIPs from subtraction and source data from bolus-chase MR angiograms (A and B, respectively) and time-resolved MR angiograms (C and D). Same septocutaneous perforator is evident on axial MIPs from subtraction and source data from bolus-chase MR angiogram (E and F) and time-resolved MR angiograms (G and H). Structures surrounding perforator can be identified on source images, which help in location of path of septocutaneous perforator. Contrast between septocutaneous perforator and surrounding soft tissues is relatively low on unsubtracted time-resolved MR angiograms.