Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 3;111(11):3984–3989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309723111

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Trends in team evolution in astronomy from 1961 to 2010. (Left) Fifty-year trend of parameters characterizing the three components of the distribution, derived from a functional fit (Eq. 1). The characteristic size (i.e., Poisson rate) of standard core teams has Inline graphic been rising throughout this period, whereas that of “core +1” teams Inline graphic has remained constant in the last two decades. The power-law slope Inline graphic has been getting shallower, i.e., the significance of the power-law component has been increasing. (Center) Fraction of articles produced by different modes of authorship (team types): standard core Inline graphic, “core +1” Inline graphic, and extended Inline graphic. (Right) Trends in the mean team size, overall Inline graphic and by team type (both types of core teams, Inline graphic, and extended teams, Inline graphic). The increase in the overall mean team size in astronomy is primarily the result of the rapid growth of power-law (extended) teams.