Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 3;111(11):3996–4000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320901111

Table 2.

Unstandardized estimates (SE in brackets) for the autoregressive and cross-lagged effects in studies 2a and 2b

Model Study 2a Study 2b
β (SE) P β (SE) P
Model 1
 Level 1
  contacttime1 → contacttime2 0.583 (0.031) <0.001 0.624 (0.039) <0.001
  prejudicetime1 → prejudicetime2 0.611 (0.024) <0.001 0.677 (0.027) <0.001
  contacttime1 → prejudicetime2 −0.055 (0.029) 0.059 −0.002 (0.004) 0.547
  prejudicetime1 → contacttime2 −0.052 (0.026) 0.044 −0.560 (0.187) 0.003
 Level 2
   contacttime1 → contacttime2 0.910 (0.101) <0.001 0.984 (0.169) <0.001
   prejudicetime1 → prejudicetime2 0.439 (0.173) 0.011 0.755 (0.209) <0.001
   contacttime1 → prejudicetime2 −0.298 (0.078) <0.001 −0.039 (0.015) 0.009
   prejudicetime1 → contacttime2 −0.101 (0.206) 0.624 2.848 (2.107) 0.177
   Contextual effect −0.243 (0.085) 0.004 −0.037 (0.016) 0.024
   Effect size of contextual effect 0.29 0.17
Model 2
 Level 2
  contacttime1 → contacttime2 0.989 (0.160) <0.001
  prejudicetime1 → prejudicetime2 0.467 (0.221) 0.034
  contacttime1 → prejudicetime2 −0.043 (0.015) 0.006
  prejudicetime1 → contacttime2 4.028 (2.492) 0.106
  normstime1 → normstime2 0.391 (0.146) 0.007
  contacttime1 → normstime 2 0.084 (0.030) 0.005
  normstime1 → prejudicetime2 −0.146 (0.057) 0.011
  Contextual effect controlling for norms 0.036 (0.017) 0.033
  Indirect effect of context 0.012 (0.007) 0.086

Note. Model 1 considers only the relationships between contact and prejudice; model 2 adds norms as a mediator. For model 2, level 1 results are shown in Table S1.