Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Relatsh. 2013 Aug 24;21(1):68–87. doi: 10.1111/pere.12018

Table 4. Study 2—Associations between Husbands’ Body Valuation, Husbands’ Non-Physical Valuation, Wives’ Perceived Commitment, Their Interactions, and Wives’ Marital Satisfaction.

Marital Satisfaction
B SE Effect Size
r
Intercept 39.65 0.57 --
Husbands’ Body Valuation (B) −1.15 0.75 .19
Husbands’ Non-Physical Valuation (NP) −0.03 0.62 .01
Wives’ Perceived Commitment (C) 4.84 0.68 .67***
B × NP −0.57 0.46 .16
B × C 4.64 0.86 .56***
NP × C −0.55 0.80 .09
B × NP × C 2.15 0.68 .37**

Note. dfs = 62. Effect size r=t2t2+df.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.