Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Relatsh. 2013 Aug 24;21(1):68–87. doi: 10.1111/pere.12018

Table 6. Study 3—Associations between Men’s Perceived Partner Body Valuation, Perceived Non-Physical Valuation, Perceived Commitment, Their Interactions, and Men’s Relationship Satisfaction.

Relationship Satisfaction
B SE Effect Size
r
Intercept 84.54 1.47 --
Body Valuation (B) −2.82 1.74 .28
Non-Physical Valuation (NP) 7.33 2.80 .42*
Partner Commitment (C) 3.89 1.52 .41*
B × NP 3.46 2.23 .26
B × C −5.47 2.27 .39*
NP × C 8.99 3.45 .42*
B × NP × C 3.27 1.37 .39*

Note. dfs = 32. Effect size r=t2t2+df.

*

p < .05.