Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Pharmacol. 2012 Jun 21;84(5):722–735. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.06.013

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effects of LTEE on PhIP:DNA adduct formation and CYP1 inducibility in MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were cultured for 35 or more passages in DC5 (Control) or DC5 containing 1 nM E2 (LTEE). Cells were then seeded in DC5 medium and were exposed for 24 h to the DMSO vehicle or 10 µM PhIP with or without 10 nM TCDD, as indicated. (A) DNA was isolated and hydrolyzed, and PhIP adducts were analyzed by LC-ESI/MS3. Data shown are the means ± SE; n = 3. Significant differences between control and LTEE cells exposed to TCDD and PhIP (***, P < 0.001) and between LTEE cells treated with and without TCDD (###, P < 0.001) are indicated. (B) EROD activities were determined, and the data shown are the means ± SE; n = 5. Significant differences between control and LTEE cells with identical treatments are indicated (***, P < 0.001). (C) Dose-response curves for inhibition of TCDD-induced EROD activity of control and LTEE cells by PhIP, with the addition of PhIP coincident with TCDD exposure (upper) or during the EROD assay (lower). Data shown are the means ± SE; n = 5. Significant differences are indicated between LTEE cells treated with TCDD alone and TCDD plus the indicated concentration of PhIP (***, P < 0.001).