Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 10;33(1):76–84. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.129

Table 2. Predictive values for the identification of patients within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Rating method Classification
Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI)
  FLAIR-negative FLAIR-positive          
Model 1: visual rating (‘liberal') No lesions ‘Subtle' and ‘obvious' lesions 0.58 (0.52–0.65) 0.78 (0.72–0.85) 0.80 (0.74–0.86) 0.56 (0.50–0.62) 0.66 (0.61–0.70)
Model 2: visual rating (‘conservative') No and ‘subtle' lesions ‘Obvious' lesions 0.86 (0.82–0.91) 0.48 (0.41–0.56) 0.71 (0.66–0.76) 0.70 (0.62–0.79) 0.71 (0.67–0.75)
Model 3: quantitative (FLAIR rSI) FLAIR rSI <1.0721 FLAIR rSI >1.0721 0.47 (0.40–0.53) 0.85 (0.80–0.91) 0.82 (0.79–0.89) 0.52 (0.46–0.58) 0.61 (0.57–0.66)
Model 4: CART Leafs A–D Leaf E 0.91 (0.87–0.94) 0.47 (0.39–0.55) 0.72 (0.67–0.77) 0.78 (0.69–0.86) 0.73 (0.69–0.77)
Model 5: CART Leafs A, B, D Leafs C, E 0.62 (0.56–0.68) 0.77 (0.71–0.84) 0.80 (0.74–0.86) 0.58 (0.51–0.65) 0.68 (0.63–0.72)
Model 6: CART Leafs A, C, D Leafs B, E 0.60 (0.54–0.66) 0.65 (0.58–0.73) 0.72 (0.66–0.78) 0.52 (0.46–0.57) 0.62 (0.57–0.67)
Model 7: CART Leafs A, D Leafs B, D, E 0.33 (0.27–0.39) 0.95 (0.92–0.98) 0.90 (0.84–0.97) 0.52 (0.46–0.57) 0.57 (0.54–0.59)
Model 8: CART Leafs A, C Leafs B, D, E 0.55 (0.49–0.62) 0.66 (0.59–0.70) 0.71 (0.64–0.77) 0.50 (0.44–0.57) 0.60 (0.55–0.65)
Model 9: CART Leaf A Leafs B, C, D, E 0.27 (0.21–0.33) 0.96 (0.93–0.99) 0.91 (0.85–0.98) 0.47 (0.42–0.53) 0.55 (0.52–0.57)

CART, Classification and Regression Tree; CI, confidence interval; FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; rSI, relative signal intensity.

Classification describes the algorithm applied to results from individual rating methods to binary groups of ‘FLAIR-positive' and ‘FLAIR-negative' patients

Accuracy describes the fraction of correctly classified patients.