Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 May 16;32(9):1685–1697. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2263388

TABLE III.

Comparison of the proposed method against the top methods in the PET Contouring Grand Challenge [59] according to the DSC metric on the head-and-neck datasets

Rank Methods DSC
1 MDc 0.813 ± 0.093
2
MD2b
0.805 ± 0.035
3 PLb 0.771 ± 0.105
4 our method 0.761 ± 0.106
5 PLg 0.749 ± 0.039
6
MD1b
0.739 ± 0.040
7 PLc 0.723 ± 0.091
8 WSb 0.687 ± 0.108