Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 2;19(4):471–477. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.31

Table 3. Significant findings at the 5% level from subgroup analyses of genetic associations with aggression.

Gene Subgroupa Model N ES (95% CI) P-value Evidenceb
Studies with categorical outcomes
 COMT Violence Allelic 6 0.59 (0.38 to 0.92) 0.02 C
 MAOA-M Violence Allelic 3 0.63 (0.42 to 1.24) 0.02 B
TPH1 Psychiatric patients Allelic 4 1.31 (1.05 to 1.64) 0.01 B
Studies with continuous outcomes
 5HTTLPR Age >16 and <65 Dominant 22 −0.11 (−0.19 to −0.01) 0.02 C
 5HTTLPR Substance users Dominant 4 −0.35 (−0.62 to −0.09) 0.01 C
 COMT Caucasian Recessive 16 0.14 (0.02 to 0.27) 0.02 C
 COMT Substance users Recessive 4 0.31 (0.02 to 0.61) 0.04 B
 COMT Anger Recessive 5 0.13 (0.02 to 0.24) 0.02 B
 COMT Caucasian Additive 16 −0.37 (−0.71 to −0.02) 0.04 C
 COMT Substance users Additive 4 −0.66 (−1.26 to −0.05) 0.03 B
 MAOA-F Aggressiveness Recessive 4 0.24 (0.01 to 0.47) 0.04 B

ES (effect size) refers to odds ratio (OR) for categorical and b or Cohen's d for continuous outcomes (with 95% confidence interval (CI)).

a

Subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity, age of participants, sample characteristics and outcome measures.

b

Assessment of cumulative evidence according to the HuGENet criteria. Details of grading scheme are in Supplementary Table 2.