Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Nov 5;38(2):304–316. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.09.012

Table 3. Quality Assessment of Study Population*.

Questions Study Assessed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
General Inclusion criteria described? 2 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 2 2
Study sample described? 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sample representative of population? 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 2
Sample selected randomly? 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 N/A 2
Non-response rate reported? 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2
General Sub-Total (%) 90 80 90 40 20 30 80 60 100 100
Systematic Review Specific Sample selected independent of orphan status? 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 2
Physical abuse defined? N/A 2 1 0 N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A
Sexual abuse defined? 0 N/A 1 0 0 1 2 N/A 1 1
Orphan status defined? 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 2 2
Measurement of physical abuse defined? N/A 2 1 0 N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A
Measurement of sexual abuse defined? 2 N/A 1 0 2 1 0 N/A 2 2
Ascertainment of orphan status described? 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2
Orphan status verified using a secondary source? 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Valid tool(s) used to measure physical abuse? N/A 2 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Valid tool(s) used to measure sexual abuse? 0 N/A 1 1 0 2 2 N/A 0 0
Reliable tool(s) used to measure physical abuse? N/A 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Reliable tool(s) used to measure sexual abuse? 0 N/A 0 0 0 2 0 N/A 0 0
Interviewer blind to orphan status? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0
Systematic Review Specific SubTotal (%) 39 67 31 27 22 50 50 22 56 50
Analysis Statistics used to assess relationship between orphan status and abuse described? 0 2 1 N/A 2 2 2 2 2 2
Any efforts to control confounders in above relationship? 2 0 1 N/A 2 0 2 2 2 2
Total Score (%)** 56 69 48 31 31 44 66 44 75 72
*

Scoring: 2=fully answered question, 1=partially answer the question and 0 =did not answer the question

**

Totals presented as proportions to enable cross-study comparisons as denominators differed between studies

N/A = not applicable