Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar;75(2):299–311. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.299

Table 4.

Parameter estimates (b) for state characteristics from simple linear regression, forward-selection multiple linear regression, and robust multiple linear regression models, in which the dependent variable is the natural log of the reporting ratio in 1999–2009

Variable Simple
Multipleb
Robust multiple
Exp(b) [95% CI] p Exp(b) [95% CI] p Exp(b) [95% CI] p
All MVT deaths (50 states)
 Centralized state medical examiner system 0.91 [0.53, 1.56] .74 1.34 [0.77, 2.32] .30 1.24 [0.73, 2.09] .43
 UPPL – Prohibited 1.43 [0.63, 3.27] .40
 .08% BAC illegal per se laws in effect before 1999 0.84 [0.49, 1.44] .52
 Prevalence of driving after drinking (%) 1.31 [0.98, 1.76] .08 1.72 [1.22, 2.42] <.01 1.71 [1.24, 2.38] <.01
 Gallons of ethanol (per 10,000 capita) 0.74 [0.43, 1.27] .28 0.47 [0.26, 0.84] .02 0.61 [0.34, 1.12] .11
 BAC testing rate among all decedents (%) 0.99 [0.98, 1.01] .42
 Rate of MVT deaths (per 100,000) 1.02 [0.97, 1.06] .43 1.03 [0.99, 1.07] .18 1.03 [0.99, 1.07] .16
R2 .2042 .3089
 Outlier state NV
Vehicle drivers killed in crashes (44 states)a
 Centralized state medical examiner system 1.07 [0.61, 1.87] .81 1.35 [0.75, 2.43] .32 1.78 [1.06, 2.99] .03
 UPPL – Prohibited 1.20 [0.55, 2.64] .65
 .08% BAC illegal per se laws in effect before 1999 0.84 [0.48, 1.46] .53
 Prevalence of driving after drinking (%) 1.34 [1.00, 1.80] .05 1.42 [1.04, 1.93] .03 1.56 [1.18, 2.05] <.01
 Gallons of ethanol (per 10,000 capita) 1.60 [0.71, 3.60] .26
 BAC testing rate among drivers killed in crashes (%) 1.00 [0.97, 1.02] .64 0.99 [0.97, 1.01] .32 1.00 [0.98, 1.01] .62
 Rate of drivers killed in MVT crashes (per 100,000) 0.99 [0.93, 1.06] .85
R2 .1188 .2789
 Outlier state MD, ND, NM

Notes: BAC = blood alcohol concentration; CI = confidence interval; MVT = motor vehicle traffic; UPPL = Uniform Accident and Sickness Policy Provision Law.

a

Six states (AK, NV, NH, NJ, UT, and VT) did not have reporting ratios for identified drivers because their numbers of alcohol-involved drivers were too small to be reported in the Multiple Cause of Death data;

b

the significance level for entry into the model was set at .50.