Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 20;8(2):135–141. doi: 10.1007/s11832-014-0567-2

Table 2.

Assessment of the quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale)

Domain Item Kreder and Armstrong [22] Skaggs et al. [23] Skaggs et al. [24]
Selection (maximum of 4 stars) Representativeness of the exposed cohort * * *
Selection of the unexposed cohort * * *
Ascertainment of exposure * * *
Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study * * *
Comparability (maximum of 2 stars) Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis Nil Nil Nil
Outcome (maximum of 3 stars) Assessment of outcome * * *
Was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur? * * *
Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts * * *

Maximum number of stars is 9 for the three domains