Table 2.
Domain | Item | Kreder and Armstrong [22] | Skaggs et al. [23] | Skaggs et al. [24] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Selection (maximum of 4 stars) | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | * | * | * |
Selection of the unexposed cohort | * | * | * | |
Ascertainment of exposure | * | * | * | |
Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | * | * | * | |
Comparability (maximum of 2 stars) | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Outcome (maximum of 3 stars) | Assessment of outcome | * | * | * |
Was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur? | * | * | * | |
Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | * | * | * |
Maximum number of stars is 9 for the three domains