Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental logoLink to Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental
. 2005 Nov;66(6):486–500. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.12.002

Effects of the addition of high-dose vitamin C to polyethylene glycol solution for colonic cleansing: A pilot study in healthy volunteers*

Stéphane Mouly 1,**, Isabelle Mahé 1, Anne-Laure Knellwolf 1, Guy Simoneau 1, Jean-François Bergmann 1
PMCID: PMC3965999  PMID: 24678071

Abstract

Background:

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions, with or without osmotic agents, are used to empty the large intestine before procedures such as colonoscopy or colonic surgery. Data concerning the effectiveness of vitamin C as an ingredient in colonic preparations are scant.

Objective:

The aim of this article was to assess the effectiveness, acceptability, and tolerability of 6 preparations of a standard PEG electrolyte solution containing different doses of PEG, vitamin C (as an osmotic agent), and sodium sulfate in colonic cleansing.

Methods:

This double-blind, randomized, 2-period crossover study was conducted at the Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France. Healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 of 6 colonic cleansing preparations, each containing different doses of PEG (100 or 125 g/L), vitamin C (0, 5, or 10 g/L, in the form of sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, or a mixture of both), and sodium sulfate (5 or 7.5 g/L), diluted in water to a volume of 2 L. Study drug administration was separated by a washout period of 7 to 15 days, after which the volunteers received an alternate preparation. Stools were collected for 10 hours after the start of solution ingestion. The primary efficacy end point was stool volume. Secondary end points included acceptability of taste, assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = excellent to 100 = execrable), taste criteria (saltiness, acidity, and sweetness, assessed on a 4-point Likert-type scale [0 = very pleasant to 3 = intolerable]) and tolerability (clinical effects [changes in body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and nausea and vomiting] and biologic effects [changes in serum electrolytes, creatinine, hematocrit, and ascorbic acid]).

Results:

Thirty volunteers (15 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 29.8 [8.2] years [range, 20–45 years]) were enrolled and completed the study. Mean (SD) stool volume obtained with preparations containing 10 g/L of vitamin C did not differ significantly from the volume obtained without vitamin C (2.54 [0.54] L vs 1.93 [0.62] L; 95% CI, −0.13 to 1.47). Mean (SD) VAS scores for acceptability of taste ranged from 54.4 (25.0) (preparation E) to 74.4 (20.1) (preparation C) (P = 0.03 preparation E vs all other preparations). The only significant difference in taste criteria was in acidity, with preparation A being the least acidic according to patients' ratings on the VAS (1.4 [0.7] vs 1.8 [0.4] [mean of the other 5 preparations combined]; P = 0.04 preparation A vs all other preparations). Mild dehydration occurred in 6 subjects (1 for each preparation). No clinical or biological adverse effects were found.

Conclusions:

In this study of 6 colonic cleansing preparations in healthy volunteers, the use of high-dose vitamin C as an osmotic agent in addition to PEG did not significantly increase stool output. All 6 preparations were well tolerated.

Key words: vitamin C, stool output, acceptability, taste, polyethylene glycol solution, colonic preparation, ascorbate, ascorbic acid

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (790.9 KB).

Footnotes

*

This article was presented in poster form at the 9th Annual Meeting of the French Society of Pharmacology, Bordeaux, France, April 26-28, 2005.

References

  • 1.Ransohoff D.F., Sandler R.S. Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:40–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp010886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Toledo T.K., DiPalma J.A. Review article: Colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:605–611. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kastenberg D., Chasen R., Choudhary C. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: Two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:705–713. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.119733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lapalus M.G., Gaudin J.L., Lemkecher T. Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation [in French] Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2001;25:29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tooson J.D., Gates L.K., Jr. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med. 1996;100:203–204. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1996.08.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Tooson J.D., Gates L.K., Jr. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med. 1996;100:207–212. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1996.08.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Tooson J.D., Gates L.K., Jr. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med. 1996;100:214. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1996.08.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosch T., Classen M. Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with “Golytely” for colonoscopic preparation: A controlled trial. Endoscopy. 1987;19:198–200. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Young C.J., Simpson R.R., King D.W., Lubowski D.Z. Oral sodium phosphate solution is a superior colonoscopy preparation to polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1568–1571. doi: 10.1007/BF02236740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Habr-Gama A., Bringel R.W., Nahas S.C. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Comparison of mannitol and sodium phosphate. Results of a prospective randomized study. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 1999;54:187–192. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87811999000600004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bini E.J., Unger J.S., Rieber J.M. Prospective randomized, single-blind comparison of two preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:218–222. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.107907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Afridi S.A., Barthel J.S., King P.D. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:485–489. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)80008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kolts B.E., Lyles W.E., Achem S.R. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1218–1223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hsu C.W., Imperiale T.F. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:276–282. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Golub R.W., Kerner B.A., Wise W.E., Jr Colonoscopic bowel preparations-which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:594–599. doi: 10.1007/BF02054117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zwas F.R., Cirillo N.W., el-Serag H.B., Eisen R.N. Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:463–466. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70286-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Iida Y., Miura S., Asada Y. Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2,000 ml of balanced lavage solution (Golytely) and sennoside. Gastroenterol Jpn. 1992;27:728–733. doi: 10.1007/BF02806525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen C.F., Lin J.K., Leu S.Y., Liang C.L. Evaluation of rapid colon preparation with Golytely. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1989;44:45–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marcus R., Coulston A.M. Water-soluble vitamins. The vitamin B complex and ascorbic acid. In: Hardman J.G., Limbird L.E., editors. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY: 1995. pp. 1555–1572. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.MacDonald L., Thumser A.E., Sharp P. Decreased expression of the vitamin C transporter SVCT1 by ascorbic acid in a human intestinal epithelial cell line. Br J Nutr. 2002;87:97–100. doi: 10.1079/BJN2001492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gerster H. High-dose vitamin C: A risk for persons with high iron stores? Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1999;69:67–82. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.69.2.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Piotrovskij V.K., Kallay Z., Gajdos M. The use of a nonlinear absorption model in the study of ascorbic acid bioavailability in man. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1993;14:429–442. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510140509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gershoff S.N. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid): New roles, new requirements? Nutr Rev. 1993;51:313–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1993.tb03757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Internal report. Pharmatel PTY Ltd; Thornleigh, Australia: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Internal report. Pharmatel PTY Ltd; Thornleigh, Australia: 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Effects of vitamin C on stool volume in healthy volunteers. Unit of Therapeutic Research, Lariboisière Hospital; Paris, France: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raymond J.M., Beyssac R., Capdenat E. Tolerance, effectiveness, and acceptability of sulphate-free electrolyte lavage solution for colon cleaning before colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 1996;28:555–558. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adams W.J., Meagher A.P., Lubowski D.Z., King D.W. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:229–233. doi: 10.1007/BF02048160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vilien M., Rytkonen M. Golytely preparation for colonoscopy: 1.5 Liters is enough for outpatients. Endoscopy. 1990;22:168–170. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yew W.S., Gerlt J.A. Utilization of Lrascorbate by Escherichia coli K-12: Assignments of functions to products of the yjf-sga and yia-sgb operons. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:302–306. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.302-306.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hill A.G., Teo W., Still A. Cellular potassium depletion predisposes to hypokalaemia after oral sodium phosphate. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68:856–858. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1998.01462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomson A., Naidoo P., Crotty B. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A randomized prospective trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;11:103–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1996.tb00044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Turnage R.H., Guice K.S., Gannon P., Gross M. The effect of polyethylene glycol gavage on plasma volume. J Surg Res. 1994;57:284–288. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1994.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES