Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2013 Oct 14;28(4):1164–1173. doi: 10.1037/a0032563

Table 2.

Results from hierarchical linear models analyses of walking, health and fitness indices collected at baseline, week 12 (end of treatment), and week 24 (follow-up).

β1
coefficient
Standard
error
T ratio
(df = 43)
p
value
Steps walked
   Control 7.0961 3.3132 2.14 .03
   Reinforcement 21.8935 3.8831 5.64 .001
   Group × time interaction −14.7974 5.1045 −2.90 .005
Systolic blood pressure
   Control −0.0090 0.0292 −0.31 .76
   Reinforcement −0.0786 0.0148 −5.33 .001
   Group × time interaction 0.0696 0.0327 2.13 .03
Diastolic blood pressure
   Control −0.0101 0.0110 −0.92 0.36
   Reinforcement −0.0468 0.0137 −3.41 .001
   Group × time interaction 0.0367 0.0176 2.09 .04
Weight
   Control −0.0108 0.0095 −1.14 .26
   Reinforcement −0.0414 0.0131 −3.18 .002
   Group × time interaction 0.0306 0.0161 1.90 .05
Waist circumference
   Control −0.0134 0.0065 −2.06 .04
   Reinforcement −0.0286 0.0089 −3.23 .002
   Group × time interaction 0.0152 0.0110 1.38 .17
Six minute walk test
   Control −0.0453 0.0606 −0.75 .46
   Reinforcement 0.1474 0.0638 2.31 .02
   Group × time interaction 0.1927 0.0880 2.19 .03
Sit-to-stand test
   Control 0.3253 0.2536 −1.28 .20
   Reinforcement −1.1846 0.3454 −3.43 .001
   Group × time interaction 0.8593 0.4285 2.01 .05

Notes: Although 43 patients were randomized and included in these analyses, not all participants (n = 3) completed the 24-week follow-up, and extreme outliers were excluded at some time points, or in the case of anti-hypertensive medication changes for blood pressure data (see methods section). β1 coefficients represent the slopes, and slopes with p values < .05 are significantly different from 0 (i.e., reflect significant changes in slope over time). When group × time interaction effects are significant (p < .05), the slopes of the two conditions differ.