Table C1.
Exp. 1 (−350 – +50ms) | Exp. 2a (−200 – +50ms) |
---|---|
ANOMALY | ANOMALY × ROI |
LAT: F(2,44) = 3.95, p=0.02 detected vs. non-detected: F(1,22)=5.10, p=0.034, marginally significant detected vs. control: F(1,22) = 7.61, p=0.011 |
LAT: F(6,126) = 5.73, p=0.002 ANOMALY - no effect in any ROI - |
MID: F(10,210)= 4.97, p=0.009 ANOMALY PZ: F(2,42)= 3.48, p = 0.040 detected vs. control: F(1,21) = 8.13, p=0.009 POZ: F(2,42)= 4.15, p = 0.023 detected vs. non-detected: F(1,21), = 8.73, p=0.007 detected vs. control: F(1,21) = 8.30, p=0.009 |
|
MID: F(2,44)= 5.74, p=0.006 detected vs. non-detected: F(1,22)=7.80, p=0.010 detected vs. control: F(1,22) = 10.80, p=0.003 |
Only effects that reached significance are reported. Analogous to the analyses reported in the main text, a modified Bonferroni procedure was used to account for multiple testing, resulting in a corrected threshold of p= 0.033 for pairwise comparisons.