Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Feb;61(2):547–556. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2283597

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Results of Gibbs Sampling on the posterior distribution. (a) Representative AFM deflection curve on a tissue sample (n = 781) data points, (b) marginal posterior in the contact point k, (c) marginal posterior of the probe compliance s, (d) marginal posterior of elastic modulus E (linearly related to β22), and (e) mean and 95% confidence intervals on multiple datasets. Note: Only those force curves with R2 > 0.99 have been shown in Fig. 4(e).