Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1971 Apr;47(4):559–561. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.4.559

Leaf Temperature Effects on Measurements of Diffusive Resistance to Water Vapor Transfer 1

P A Morrow a, R O Slatyer b
PMCID: PMC396726  PMID: 16657660

Abstract

Substantial errors can be introduced to estimates of leaf resistance (rl) obtained from diffusion porometers unless precautions are taken to reduce the leaf-cup temperature difference (Tleaf — Tcup) to acceptable levels prior to measurement. When Tleaf > Tcup, underestimation of leaf resistance occurs; the reverse applies when Tleaf < Tcup.

The effect is most pronounced under open-stomata conditions and declines as stomatal resistance increases. Under typical measurement conditions, Tleaf — Tcup values of the order of 1 C induce a reduction in the ratio of the apparent to true leaf resistance to about 0.8 when the leaf resistance is low (rl = 1-2 sec cm−1). When Tleaf — Tcup = 5 C, the ratio drops below 0.5. Under high leaf resistance conditions (rl = 10-50 sec cm−1) the comparable ratios are approximately 0.9 and 0.7, respectively.

Full text

PDF
559

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kanemasu E. T., Thurtell G. W., Tanner C. B. Design calibration and field use of a stomatal diffusion porometer. Plant Physiol. 1969 Jun;44(6):881–885. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.6.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wallihan E. F. Modification and Use of an Electric Hygrometer for Estimating Relative Stomatal Apertures. Plant Physiol. 1964 Jan;39(1):86–90. doi: 10.1104/pp.39.1.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. van Bavel C. H., Nakayama F. S., Ehrler W. L. Measuring Transpiration Resistance of Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1965 May;40(3):535–540. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES