Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 6;4(2):278–289. doi: 10.1002/brb3.216

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Responding to an alcohol-predictive CS+ is invigorated in an alcohol context, compared to a nonalcohol context. (A) Mean (± SEM) normalized port entries during the CS+ (filled bars) and CS− (open bars) at test in the alcohol context and nonalcohol context. At test the CS+ and CS− were presented without ethanol. (B) Mean (± SEM) port entries averaged across blocks of two CS+ trials at test in the alcohol context (filled circles) and nonalcohol context (open circles). (C) Mean (± SEM) total port entries across sessions of exposure to the alternate (nonalcohol) context (filled circles) in which neither cues nor alcohol were presented. Bars represent mean (± SEM) total port entries at test in the alcohol context (filled bar) and nonalcohol context (open bar). *, ^P < 0.05 for indicated comparisons.