Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 4;2014:952095. doi: 10.1155/2014/952095

Table 1.

Clinical, pathological, and follow-up data of all the included patients. Comparative analysis between MI-FTC and WI-FTC.

All patients MI-FTC WI-FTC P value
Patients 130 66 64
Age (±SDa) (range) years 51.1 ± 14.5 (18–88) 50.0 ± 11.6 (28–76) 52.3 ± 9.9 (18–88) NS*
Male/female 39/91 15/51 24/40 NS*
Tumour size (± SDa) (range) mm 28.9 ± 16.6 (5–100) 23.1 ± 13.0 (5–70) 35.1 ± 17.8 (11–100) <0.001
Distant metastasis at diagnosis 4 1 3 NS*
pT stage
 T1/T2/T3 36/63/31 27/33/6 9/30/25 <0.001
pT1 36 27 9 <0.001
pT2 63 33 30 NS*
pT3 31 6 25 <0.001
pN stage
 NX/N0/N1 129/0/1 66/0/0 63/0/1 NS*
pM stage
 M0/M1 126/4 65/1 61/3 NS*
Multifocal disease 4 2 2 NS*
Microcarcinoma 7 5 2 NS*
HCC 63 25 38 <0.05
Concomitant PTC 21 15 6 NS*
Follow-up yes/no 117/13 62/4 55/9 NS*
Follow-up (±SDa) (range) months 103.9 ± 39.5 (17–182) 95.5 ± 111.0 (17–174) 104.5 ± 109.5 (27–182) NS*
RAI/no RAI 105/12 54/8 51/3 NS*
Distant metastasis at follow-up 3 0 3 NS*

SDa: standard deviation; NS*: not significant.