Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 27;10(3):e1003526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003526

Figure 1. Comparison between the classical and fractional leaky integrate-and-fire models.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic circuit diagrams for the classical (left) and fractional order (right) leaky integrate-and-fire models. (B) Sub-threshold response in the classical (left) and fractional models (right). Both stimulated with Inline graphic nA. (C) The sub-threshold voltage response converges to a power-law function when Inline graphic decreases. (D) While the classical model (left) generates regular spiking to a constant input, the fractional model (right) shows first spike latency and spike adaptation. Both models stimulated with Inline graphic nA. (E) The first-spike latency produced by the fractional model becomes longer when Inline graphic is smaller. (F) The inter-spike interval histogram as a function of Inline graphic. The histogram shows power-law distribution as Inline graphic. (G) The inter-spike intervals decrease over time as a function of Inline graphic. The color key in C applies to F and G.