Table 1. Sample description.
girls (n = 865) | boys (n = 903) | total (n = 1768) | |
Individual-level correlates n (%) | |||
Socioeconomic status | |||
low | 238 (27.9) | 220 (24.7) | 458 (26.3) |
medium | 416 (48.8) | 453 (50.9) | 869 (49.9) |
high | 198 (23.2) | 217 (24.4) | 415 (23.8) |
Migration background | |||
no | 758 (87.7) | 818 (90.6) | 1576 (89.2) |
yes | 106 (12.3) | 85 (9.4) | 191 (10.8) |
Participation in sports club activities | |||
no | 450 (52.1) | 367 (40.8) | 817 (46.4) |
yes | 413 (47.9) | 532 (59.2) | 945 (53.6) |
Community-level correlates | |||
Level of urbanization n (%) | |||
rural | 477 (55.1) | 513 (56.8) | 990 (56.0) |
urban | 388 (44.9) | 390 (43.2) | 778 (44.0) |
Unemployment rate M±SD | 7.3 ±4.0 | 7.2 ±3.9 | 7.2 ±3.9 |
Straight line distances (in kilometers) to the closest sports facilities M±SD | |||
straigt line distance to gym | 1.21 ±1.43 | 1.31 ±1.61 | 1.26 ±1.53 |
straight line distance to tennis court | 2.17 ±2.12 | 2.09 ±2.25 | 2.13 ±2.18 |
straigt line distance to indoor pool | 3.96 ±4.84 | 4.28 ±5.17 | 4.12 ±5.01 |
Note: numbers may not add to the full sample sizes due to missing values.