Table 3.
Line | Biological weight (g) | Panicle length (cm) | Filled grain | Total grain | Grain filling (%) | 1,000-grain weight (g) | Harvest index (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T34 | 128.1 ± 2.1bc | 25.1 ± 1.1 | 1,250.7 ± 148.0b | 2,547.3 ± 231.6b | 47.9 ± 4.7 | 24.7 ± 0.3 | 24.1 ± 2.4a |
T51 | 135.8 ± 27.6bcd | 23.6 ± 1.2 | 2,496.3 ± 201.8e | 4,261.0 ± 964.9e | 60.2 ± 11.0 | 25.7 ± 0.3 | 48.7 ± 12.1cd |
T53 | 125.8 ± 28.9b | 22.1 ± 1.9 | 2,289.0 ± 721.1d | 3,997.3 ± 898.9d | 56.5 ± 4.8 | 23.5 ± 1.6 | 42.6 ± 7.8c |
T54 | 104.2 ± 30.7a | 23.7 ± 3.6 | 2,121.3 ± 2,071.3c | 3,892.0 ± 2,471.1c | 47.3 ± 17.5 | 22.7 ± 0.2 | 41.8 ± 32.2b |
WT | 67.3 ± 4.1a | 21.0 ± 1.2 | 565.0 ± 163.4a | 1,166.0 ± 182.0a | 47.8 ± 6.3 | 26.2 ± 0.5 | 21.9 ± 5.3a |
Grain filling (%) = filled grain/total grain × 100 %, Harvest index (%) = filled grain weight/biological weight × 100 %. Values shown are averages of three replicates. Statistical analyses were undertaken using SPSS and MS Excel 2010. a, b, c, d, e indicated significant difference